首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Scandinavian Journal of Primary Health Care >Validation of the Zung self-rating depression scale (SDS) in older adults
【2h】

Validation of the Zung self-rating depression scale (SDS) in older adults

机译:老年人Zung自评抑郁量表(SDS)的验证

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

>Objective: The main objective of this study was to investigate the psychometric properties of the Zung Self-Rating Depression Scale (SDS) and evaluate screening parameters capability of the SDS with the Beck Depression Inventory (BDI-21) among the elderly population.Design: A population-based study>Setting: Community>Subjects: 520 adults, aged 72–73 years, living in the city of Oulu, Finland.Main outcome measures: The screening parameters of the SDS questions and BDI-21 for detecting severity of depression. The Mini Neuropsychiatric Interview for diagnosing major depression.>Results: The optimal cut-off point for the SDS was 39. The sensitivity and specificity parameters for this cut-off point were 79.2% (95% CI 57.8–92.9) and 72.2% (95% CI 67.9–76.1), respectively. Positive and negative predictive values were 12.5% (95% CI 7.7–18.8) and 98.6% (95% CI 96.7–99.5), respectively. Moreover, there was no statistically significant difference in diagnostic accuracy indices of the cut-off points 39 and 40. In a receiver operating characteristic analysis, the area under the curve was 0.85 (95%CI 0.77–0.92) for the SDS total score and 0.89 (95% CI 0.83-0.96) for the BDI-21 (p = 0.137).>Conclusion: Using the traditional cut-off point, the SDS was convenient for identifying clinically meaningful depressive symptoms in an elderly Finnish population when compared with the BDI-21 which is one of the most commonly used depression screening scales. The sensitivity and specificity of these two screening tools are comparable.Based on our study, the SDS is convenient for identifying clinically meaningful depressive symptoms among older adults at the community level. style="clear:both">Key points class="unordered" style="list-style-type:disc">The widely used Zung Self-Rating Depression Scale (SDS) has not previously been validated among elderly people at the community level.The sensitivity and specificity of SDS (cut-off point 39) were 79.2% and 72.2%.The positive and negative predictive values for SDS were 12.5% and 98.6%.SDS is convenient for identifying major depression in an elderly population and regarding sensitivity and specificity comparable to BDI-21.
机译:>目的:本研究的主要目的是调查“贝克自评量表”(ZDS)的心理测量特性,并通过贝克抑郁量表(BDI-21)评估该SDS的筛选参数能力。设计:一项基于人群的研究>设置:社区>受试者:居住在芬兰奥卢市的520名年龄在72-73岁的成年人。结果测量:用于检测抑郁严重程度的SDS问题和BDI-21的筛选参数。迷你神经精神病学诊断严重抑郁症的访谈。>结果: SDS的最佳分界点为39。该分界点的敏感性和特异性参数为79.2%(95%CI 57.8– 92.9)和72.2%(95%CI 67.9-76.1)。阳性和阴性预测值分别为12.5%(95%CI 7.7-18.8)和98.6%(95%CI 96.7-99.5)。此外,截止点39和40的诊断准确度指标在统计​​学上没有显着差异。在接收器工作特性分析中,SDS总分的曲线下面积为0.85(95%CI 0.77–0.92)。 BDI-21为0.89(95%CI 0.83-0.96)(p = 0.137)。>结论:使用传统的临界点,SDS可以方便地识别老年人的临床上有意义的抑郁症状与BDI-21相比,芬兰人口是最常用的抑郁症筛查量表之一。这两种筛查工具的敏感性和特异性是可比的。根据我们的研究,SDS可以方便地在社区层面识别老年人的临床上有意义的抑郁症状。 style =“ clear:both”>要点 class =“ unordered” style =“ list-style-type:disc”> <!-list-behavior = unordered prefix-word = mark-type = disc max-label-size = 0->
  • 先前尚未在社区一级的老年人中验证广泛使用的Zung自评抑郁量表(SDS)。 SDS的敏感性和特异性(临界点39)为79.2%, 72.2%。 SDS的阳性和阴性预测值分别为12.5%和98.6%。 SDS便于识别老年人的严重抑郁症,并且其敏感性和特异性与BDI-21。
  • 著录项

    相似文献

    • 外文文献
    • 中文文献
    • 专利
    代理获取

    客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

    京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
    • 客服微信

    • 服务号