首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine >Quality of information accompanying on-line marketing of home diagnostic tests
【2h】

Quality of information accompanying on-line marketing of home diagnostic tests

机译:伴随家庭诊断测试的在线营销的信息质量

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

>Objective To assess the quality of information provided to consumers by websites marketing medical home diagnostic tests.>Design A cross-sectional analysis of a database developed from searching targeted websites.>Setting Data sources were websites written in English which marketed medical home diagnostic tests.>Main outcome measures A meta-search engine was used to identify the first 20 citations for each type of home diagnostic medical test. Relevant websites limited to those written in English were reviewed independently and in triplicate, with disputes resolved by two further reviewers. Information on the quality of these sites was extracted using a pre-piloted performer.>Results 168 websites were suitable for inclusion in the review. The quality of these sites showed marked variation. Only 24 of 168 (14.2%) complied with at least three-quarters of the quality items and just over half (95 of 168, 56.5%) reported official approval or certification of the test. Information on accuracy of the test marketed was reported by 87 of 168 (51.7%) websites, with 15 of 168 (8.9%) providing a scientific reference. Instructions for use of the product were found in 97 of 168 (57.9%). However, the course of action to be taken after obtaining the test result was stated in only 63 of 168 (37.5%) for a positive result and 43 of 168 (25.5%) for a negative result.>Conclusions The quality of information posted on commercial websites marketing home tests online is unsatisfactory and potentially misleading for consumers.
机译:>目标:评估通过营销医疗家用诊断测试网站向消费者提供的信息的质量。>设计是通过搜索目标网站开发的数据库的横断面分析。>设置数据来源是用英语编写的网站,上面销售医疗家庭诊断测试。>主要结果指标,使用元搜索引擎来识别每种类型的家庭诊断医疗测试的前20条引文。仅限以英语撰写的相关网站进行了独立和一式三份的审核,其中争议由另外两名审核员解决。使用预先试过的表演者提取了有关这些网站质量的信息。>结果有168个网站适合纳入评论。这些站点的质量显示出明显的差异。 168个样本中只有24个(14.2%)符合至少四分之三的质量要求,而一半以上的样本(168个样本中的95个,占56.5%)表示已通过测试的官方认可或认证。 168个网站中的87个(51.7%)网站报告了所销售测试的准确性,其中168个网站中的15个(8.9%)提供了科学参考。在168中的97中找到了使用该产品的说明(57.9%)。但是,只有168分中的63分(37.5%)表示阳性,而168分中的43分(25.5%)表示阴性,则得出测试结果后应采取的措施。>结论在在线销售家庭测试的商业网站上发布的信息质量不能令人满意,并且可能会误导消费者。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号