首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine >Open access publishing and author-pays business models: a survey of authors knowledge and perceptions
【2h】

Open access publishing and author-pays business models: a survey of authors knowledge and perceptions

机译:开放获取出版和作者付费业务模式:作者知识和观念调查

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Objectives: We aimed to assess journal authors' current knowledge and perceptions of open access and author-pays publishing.Design: An electronic survey.Setting: Authors of research papers submitted to BMJ, Archives of Disease in Childhood, and Journal of Medical Genetics in 2004.Main outcome measures: Familiarity with and perceptions of open access and author-pays publishing.Results: 468/1113 (42%) responded. Prior to definitions being provided, 47% (222/468) and 38% (176/468) reported they were familiar with the terms `open access' and `author-pays' publishing, respectively. Some who did not at first recognize the terms, did claim to recognize them when they were defined. Only 10% (49/468) had submitted to an author-pays journal. Compared with non-open access subscription-based journals, 35% agreed that open access author-pays journals have a greater capacity to publish more content making it easier to get published, 27% thought they had lower impact factors, 31% thought they had faster and more timely publicaitons, and 46% agreed that people will think anyone can pay to get published. 55% (256/468) thought they would not continue to submit to their respective journal if it became open access and charged, largely because of the reputaiton of the journals. Half (54%, 255/468) said open access has `no impact' or was `low priority' in their submission decisions. Two-thirds (66%, 308/468) said they would prefer to submit to a non-open access subscription-based journal than an open access author-pays journal. Over half thought they would have to make a contribution or pay the full cost of an author charge (56%, 262/468).Conclusions: The survey yielded useful information about respondents' knowledge and perceptions of these publishing models. Authors have limited familiarity with the concept of open-access publishing and surrounding issues. Currently, open access policies have little impact on authors' decision of where to submit papers.
机译:目标:我们旨在评估期刊作者对开放获取和作者付费出版的当前知识和看法设计:电子调查环境:提交给BMJ,《儿童疾病档案》和《医学遗传学杂志》的研究论文作者2004年,主要成果指标:对开放获取和作者付费出版的熟悉和感知。结果:468/1113(42%)做出了回应。在提供定义之前,有47%(222/468)和38%(176/468)表示他们分别熟悉“开放获取”和“作者付费”发布。有些最初不认识这些术语的人,确实声称在定义这些术语时就认识它们。只有10%(49/468)提交了作者付费期刊。与基于非开放获取订阅的期刊相比,有35%的受访者认为开放获取作者付费期刊具有更大的发布更多内容的能力,从而更易于发表;有27%的受访者认为影响因子较低,有31%的受访者认为更快,更及时的发布,并且有46%的人同意人们会认为任何人都可以为出版而付费。 55%(256/468)认为,一旦成为开放获取并收取费用,他们将不会继续向各自的期刊提交内容,这在很大程度上是因为期刊的声誉。一半(54%,255/468)表示开放式访问对他们的提交决定没有影响,或者优先级低。三分之二(66%,308/468)表示,与开放访问作者付费期刊相比,他们更愿意提交非基于开放订阅的期刊。超过半数的受访者认为他们必须做出贡献或支付作者全部费用(56%,262/468)。结论:该调查产生了有关受访者对这些出版模式的知识和看法的有用信息。作者对开放获取发布和周围问题的概念了解有限。当前,开放获取政策对作者决定在何处提交论文影响不大。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号