首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine >Analgesia for venous cannulation: a comparison of EMLA (5 minutes application) lignocaine ethyl chloride and nothing.
【2h】

Analgesia for venous cannulation: a comparison of EMLA (5 minutes application) lignocaine ethyl chloride and nothing.

机译:静脉插管镇痛:比较EMLA(5分钟使用)利多卡因氯乙烷什么也没有。

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Three commonly available local anaesthetics were compared, in a controlled trial, for use before venous cannulation. The pain of application of the local anaesthetic, the pain of cannulation, and the rate of successful cannulations were compared. The value of EMLA cream applied for 5 min was questioned. Venous cannulation with a 20G venflon was found to be significantly more painful than the application of any of the local anaesthetics (P < 0.01). Lignocaine 1%, injected subcutaneously, and ethyl chloride spray significantly reduced the pain of venous cannulation (P < 0.01). The use of lignocaine did not result in significantly more failed cannulations than the control group. It was concluded that local anaesthesia should be used before venous cannulation, even for 20G cannulae.
机译:在一项对照试验中,比较了三种常用的局麻药,以便在静脉插管前使用。比较了使用局部麻醉药的痛苦,插管的痛苦和成功插管的比率。对5分钟内使用的EMLA乳霜的价值提出了质疑。发现使用20G venflon进行静脉插管比使用任何局部麻醉药要痛苦得多(P <0.01)。皮下注射1%的利多卡因和氯乙烷喷雾剂可显着减轻静脉插管的疼痛(P <0.01)。与对照组相比,利多卡因的使用不会导致更多的失败的插管。结论是在静脉插管前应使用局部麻醉,即使对于20G插管也应如此。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号