首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Pilot and Feasibility Studies >Clinical comparative effectiveness of acupuncture versus manual therapy treatment of lateral epicondylitis: feasibility randomized clinical trial
【2h】

Clinical comparative effectiveness of acupuncture versus manual therapy treatment of lateral epicondylitis: feasibility randomized clinical trial

机译:针刺与手法治疗外侧上con炎的临床比较效果:可行性随机临床试验

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

BackgroundLateral epicondylitis (LE) is a challenging condition for clinicians, and research has yet not proven the superiority of one specific treatment approach. However, manual therapy (elbow mobilization) in addition to eccentric exercise has been found to be superior to exercise alone. As well, acupuncture is effective in short-term pain relief when compared with sham treatment, but there is little knowledge on the comparative effectiveness of manual therapy and acupuncture treatment of LE in terms of pain relief. The primary objective of this pilot trial was to assess the feasibility (retention and adherence rates) of performing a randomized controlled trial (RCT) to explore the clinical effectiveness of acupuncture and manual therapy treatment of LE.
机译:背景上睑上睑炎(LE)对临床医生来说是一个具有挑战性的疾病,而研究尚未证明一种特定治疗方法的优越性。然而,除了离心运动之外,还发现手动疗法(肘部动员)优于单独运动。同样,与假手术相比,针灸可有效缓解短期疼痛,但就疼痛缓解而言,关于LE的手法治疗和针刺治疗的相对有效性知之甚少。该试验性试验的主要目的是评估进行随机对照试验(RCT)的可行性(保留率和依从率),以探讨针灸和手法治疗LE的临床有效性。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号