首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>The Linacre Quarterly >An Ethical Analysis of Withdrawal of Therapy in Patients with Implantable Cardiac Electronic Devices: Application of a Novel Decision Algorithm
【2h】

An Ethical Analysis of Withdrawal of Therapy in Patients with Implantable Cardiac Electronic Devices: Application of a Novel Decision Algorithm

机译:植入式心脏电子设备患者退出治疗的伦理分析:一种新型决策算法的应用

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Patients with cardiovascular implantable electronic devices (CIEDs), which include pacemakers and implantable cardioverter-defibrillators (ICDs), may request deactivation of their devices as they approach the end of life. The Heart Rhythm Society (2010) has stated that “ethically, and legally, there are no differences between refusing CIED therapy and requesting withdrawal of CIED therapy.” On the basis of the principle that there is no ethical distinction between withholding and withdrawing treatment, this professional organization has suggested that both the antibradycardia and antitachycardia features of these devices may be disabled at the patient's request. We argue that disabling ICD shocks is analogs to a do-not-resuscitate order and is ethically permissible whereas withdrawing pacing from a pacemaker-dependent patient is an act of intentionally hastening death and not morally licit.
机译:带有心脏起搏器和可植入心脏复律除颤器(ICD)的心血管可植入电子设备(CIED)的患者可能会在生命周期即将结束时要求停用其设备。 《心律协会》(2010年)指出,“在道德和法律上,拒绝CIED治疗与要求退出CIED治疗之间没有区别。”基于在保留治疗和撤回治疗之间没有伦理上的区别的原则,该专业组织建议可以应患者的要求禁用这些设备的抗心动过缓和心动过速功能。我们认为,禁用ICD电击类似于“不复活”命令,并且在伦理上是允许的,而从依赖起搏器的患者中退出起搏是故意加速死亡而不是道德上合法的行为。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号