首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Diagnostic Pathology >Static telepathology in cancer institute of Tehran university: report of the first academic experience in Iran
【2h】

Static telepathology in cancer institute of Tehran university: report of the first academic experience in Iran

机译:德黑兰大学癌症研究所的静态远程病理学:伊朗首次学术经历的报告

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Telepathology is the practice of pathology, which allows quick and timely access to an expert opinion at a distance. We analyzed our new experience in cancer Institute of Tehran University of Medical Sciences with the iPath telepathology server of Basel University. One hundred sixty one cases in a period of 32 months were consulted. These cases received for second evaluation but the definite diagnosis could not be made in this centre. The number of images per case ranged from 3 to 32 (mean: 8). Except one case all cases were evaluated by consultants. Definite final diagnosis was achieved in 88/160 (54.7%). Recommendations for further evaluation were offered in 42/160 cases (26%). Major discrepancies were encountered in 30/160 cases (19%). Thirty-nine of the cases (24.3%) were reported within 1 day. The rate of achieving final diagnosis was higher in histological group rather than cytological ones. Increase in number of H&E images had no significant effect on achieving a definite final diagnosis. The rate of achieving final diagnosis in this study is much lower than other similar studies, which could be due to inappropriate sampling images, a potential cause of misdiagnosis in static telepathology. The other possible reason is that all of the cases in this study were problematic cases that a definite diagnosis could not be made for them even in primary consultation. The mean time for achieving a final diagnosis was also more than other studies, which could be for the reasons mentioned above.
机译:远程病理学是病理学的一种实践,可以快速而及时地获得远距离的专家意见。我们使用巴塞尔大学的iPath远程病理服务器分析了我们在德黑兰医科大学癌症研究所的新经验。在32个月内共咨询了161个案例。这些病例接受了第二次评估,但在该中心无法做出明确的诊断。每种情况下的图像数量在3到32之间(平均:8)。除一个案例外,所有案例均由顾问进行评估。最终的确诊率为88/160(54.7%)。在42/160个案例中(26%)提供了进一步评估的建议。 30/160例中有重大差异(19%)。 1天内报告了三十九例(24.3%)。组织学组的最终诊断率高于细胞学组。 H&E图像数量的增加对实现明确的最终诊断没有重大影响。在这项研究中达到最终诊断的比率比其他类似研究要低得多,这可能是由于不适当的采样图像所致,这可能是静态远程病理学误诊的潜在原因。另一个可能的原因是,本研究中的所有病例都是有问题的病例,即使在初诊时也无法对其做出明确的诊断。达到最终诊断的平均时间也比其他研究多,这可能是出于上述原因。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号