首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Disease Markers >CYP17 MspA1 Polymorphism and Age at Menarche: A Meta-Analysis
【2h】

CYP17 MspA1 Polymorphism and Age at Menarche: A Meta-Analysis

机译:CYP17 MspA1多态性与初潮年龄:一项荟萃分析

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Objective: Literature data on the effects of CYP17 MspA1 polymorphism on age at menarche (AAM) are inconsistent. To reexamine this controversy, we performed a meta-analysis. Study design: In total 16 studies containing more than 11000 individuals of various ethnicities were selected for the analyses. For 11 case-control studies, odds ratio (OR) was employed to evaluate the risk of late AAM for each study, using homozygote at the wild-type allele as a control group. For the 5 studies with continuous outcomes, the effect size was estimated using the Hedges’ adjusted g, which is calculated based on the standardized mean difference between groups of subjects with early and late AAM. Results: We did not find evidence for association of the MspA1 polymorphism with AAM in the combined case-control sample with mixed ethnic background (OR = 1.03, 95% CI: 0.90–1.18, P = 0.66), in the monoethnic case-control sample of Caucasian females (OR = 1.09, 95% CI: 0.99–1.20, P = 0.08) and in the combined sample with continuous traits (Hedges’ g = 0.33 and −0.041, 95% CI: −0.14–0.80 and −0.18–0.10, P values 0.17 and 0.56 for the pooled population sample and monoethnic sample of Caucasian females, respectively). Conclusion: Our study showed that CYP17 MspA1 polymorphism was not a significant independent risk factor of AAM. Further studies are needed to clarify the effects of the interaction between this gene and other genetic and/or environment factors on AAM.
机译:目的:关于CYP17 MspA1基因多态性对初潮年龄的影响的文献资料不一致。为了重新审视这一争议,我们进行了荟萃分析。研究设计:总共分析了16个研究,其中包含11000多个不同种族的个体。对于11个病例对照研究,使用野生型等位基因上的纯合子作为对照组,使用比值比(OR)评估每项研究晚期AAM的风险。对于5项具有连续结果的研究,使用Hedges调整后的g估算了效应量,该值是根据AAM早期和晚期受试者组之间的标准均值差计算得出的。结果:在单种族病例对照中,在混合种族背景(OR = 1.03,95%CI:0.90-1.18,P = 0.66)的病例对照样本中,我们没有发现MspA1多态性与AAM相关的证据。白人女性样本(OR = 1.09,95%CI:0.99–1.20,P = 0.08)和具有连续性状的合并样本(Hedges'g = 0.33和−0.041,95%CI:−0.14–0.80和−0.18 –0.10,合并的白人女性样本和单种族样本的P值分别为0.17和0.56)。结论:我们的研究表明CYP17 MspA1多态性不是AAM的重要独立危险因素。需要进一步研究以阐明该基因与其他遗传和/或环境因素之间的相互作用对AAM的影响。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号