首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Educational and Psychological Measurement >Further Considerations in Using Items With Diverse Content to Measure Acquiescence
【2h】

Further Considerations in Using Items With Diverse Content to Measure Acquiescence

机译:使用内容多样的项目测量默认值时的其他注意事项

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

To measure the response style of acquiescence, researchers recommend the use of at least 15 items with heterogeneous content. Such an approach is consistent with its theoretical definition and is a substantial improvement over traditional methods. Nevertheless, measurement of acquiescence can be enhanced by two additional considerations: first, to ensure that it is not confounded with item valence, equal numbers of positively and negatively phrased items should be used; second, the validity of acquiescence scores can be substantially improved when derived from more than 15 items: about twice that number appears to be the minimum. These issues are illustrated empirically and recommendations are made for research practice.
机译:为了衡量默认的响应方式,研究人员建议至少使用15种内容不同的项目。这种方法与其理论定义是一致的,并且是对传统方法的实质性改进。尽管如此,可以通过两个额外的考虑来增强对默认值的度量:第一,为了确保它不与项目价混淆,应使用相等数量的正负项目。第二,默认得分的有效性在从15个以上的项目中得出时可以得到显着提高:这个数字的两倍似乎是最小的。对这些问题进行了经验说明,并为研究实践提出了建议。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号