首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Environmental Health Perspectives >The Navigation Guide Systematic Review Methodology: A Rigorous and Transparent Method for Translating Environmental Health Science into Better Health Outcomes
【2h】

The Navigation Guide Systematic Review Methodology: A Rigorous and Transparent Method for Translating Environmental Health Science into Better Health Outcomes

机译:导航指南系统评价方法:将环境健康科学转化为更好的健康结果的严格而透明的方法

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Background: Synthesizing what is known about the environmental drivers of health is instrumental to taking prevention-oriented action. Methods of research synthesis commonly used in environmental health lag behind systematic review methods developed in the clinical sciences over the past 20 years.Objectives: We sought to develop a proof of concept of the “Navigation Guide,” a systematic and transparent method of research synthesis in environmental health.Discussion: The Navigation Guide methodology builds on best practices in research synthesis in evidence-based medicine and environmental health. Key points of departure from current methods of expert-based narrative review prevalent in environmental health include a prespecified protocol, standardized and transparent documentation including expert judgment, a comprehensive search strategy, assessment of “risk of bias,” and separation of the science from values and preferences. Key points of departure from evidence-based medicine include assigning a “moderate” quality rating to human observational studies and combining diverse evidence streams.Conclusions: The Navigation Guide methodology is a systematic and rigorous approach to research synthesis that has been developed to reduce bias and maximize transparency in the evaluation of environmental health information. Although novel aspects of the method will require further development and validation, our findings demonstrated that improved methods of research synthesis under development at the National Toxicology Program and under consideration by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency are fully achievable. The institutionalization of robust methods of systematic and transparent review would provide a concrete mechanism for linking science to timely action to prevent harm.Citation: Woodruff TJ, Sutton P. 2014. The Navigation Guide systematic review methodology: a rigorous and transparent method for translating environmental health science into better health outcomes. Environ Health Perspect 122:1007–1014; 
机译:背景:综合了解有关健康的环境驱动因素,有助于采取预防措施。环境卫生中常用的研究合成方法落后于过去20年来临床科学中开发的系统综述方法。目的:我们寻求开发“导航指南”的概念证明,这是一种系统,透明的研究合成方法讨论:“导航指南”方法以循证医学和环境卫生研究综合的最佳实践为基础。偏离当前在环境卫生中普遍使用的基于专家的叙事方法的要点包括:预先规定的方案,包括专家判断的标准化且透明的文档,全面的搜索策略,“偏见风险”评估以及科学与价值观的分离和偏好。偏离循证医学的关键点包括为人类观察研究分配“中等”质量评级,并结合各种证据流。结论:导航指南方法是一种系统,严格的研究合成方法,旨在减少偏差和最大化环境健康信息评估的透明度。尽管该方法的新颖方面需要进一步的开发和验证,但我们的发现表明,完全有可能实现美国国家毒理学计划正在开发,美国环境保护局正在考虑的改进的研究综合方法。强有力的系统透明审查方法的制度化,将为将科学与及时行动联系起来以防止损害提供具体的机制。引文:Woodruff TJ,Sutton P.2014。导航指南系统审查方法:翻译环境的严格而透明的方法将健康科学转化为更好的健康结果。环境健康展望122:1007-1014;

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号