首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Environmental Health Perspectives >Allergic contact sensitizing chemicals as environmental carcinogens.
【2h】

Allergic contact sensitizing chemicals as environmental carcinogens.

机译:过敏性接触致敏化学品为环境致癌物。

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Chemicals that were bioassayed by the National Toxicology Program (NTP) and that also produce allergic dermatitis (ACD) in humans were evaluated for their tumorigenic characteristics. The impetus for the study was that most contact sensitizers, i.e., those that produce ACD, and genotoxic carcinogens are chemically similar in that they are electrophilic, thereby producing adducts on macromolecules including protein and DNA. This similarity in chemical behavior suggests that many contact sensitizers might be environmental carcinogens. All of the published NTP bioassays by early 1996 that had both genotoxicity and carcinogenicity studies were included in this analysis. The NTP chemicals had been chosen for bioassay without regard to their ability to produce ACD. Of the 209 chemicals that were bioassayed, there were 36 (17%) that were known to be human contact sensitizers; about half of these were positive on tumor bioassays. The contact sensitizers differed from the NTP sample as a whole by having a proportionately larger number of nongenotoxic chemicals by the Ames Salmonella assay, presumably because more of them were selected on the basis of widespread usage rather than structural resemblance to known carcinogens. Compared to the nongenotoxic chemicals, the genotoxics were stronger carcinogens in that they had a higher incidence of positive tumor bioassays, with twice the number of organs in which tumors were induced. The nongenotoxic chemicals had a preference for tumor induction in parenchymal tissues in contrast to epithelial tissues. The contact sensitizers showed essentially the same characteristics as the whole NTP sample when stratified according to genotoxicity. Judging by the chemicals that were chosen primarily for their widespread use rather than for their structural resemblance to carcinogens, the addition of a test for contact sensitization to the Ames test as a screening tool would increase the tumorigenic detection efficiency by about 40% because of the nongenotoxic tumorigens. A ballpark estimate suggests that there could be several thousand contact sensitizers for humans in commercial use that are rodent tumorigens.
机译:对通过国家毒理学计划(NTP)进行生物分析并且还会在人体内产生过敏性皮炎(ACD)的化学药品的致癌特性进行了评估。该研究的推动力是大多数接触敏化剂,即产生ACD的那些和遗传毒性致癌物在化学上相似,因为它们是亲电的,从而在大分子上产生加合物,包括蛋白质和DNA。化学行为的相似性表明,许多接触敏化剂可能是环境致癌物。到1996年初,所有已发表的同时具有遗传毒性和致癌性研究的NTP生物测定法都包括在该分析中。选择NTP化学品进行生物测定时,无需考虑产生ACD的能力。经过生物测定的209种化学药品中,有36种(17%)被称为人类接触敏化剂。其中约一半在肿瘤生物测定中呈阳性。接触敏化剂与整个NTP样品的不同之处在于,通过Ames沙门氏菌测定法具有一定比例的大量非遗传毒性化学物质,大概是因为它们的选择更多是基于广泛的用途而不是与已知致癌物的结构相似。与非遗传毒性化学药品相比,遗传毒性更强的致癌物,因为它们具有较高的阳性肿瘤生物检测阳性率,其诱发肿瘤的器官数量是其两倍。与上皮组织相比,非遗传毒性化学物质优先在实质组织中诱导肿瘤。根据基因毒性分层时,接触敏化剂显示出与整个NTP样品基本相同的特性。从主要是由于其广泛用途而不是与致癌物的结构相似而选择的化学药品来看,在Ames试验中添加接触敏化试验作为筛查工具将使致癌性检测效率提高约40%,因为非遗传毒性肿瘤。粗略估计表明,可能有成千上万种用于人类的接触性敏化剂是啮齿动物的致癌物。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号