首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>European Journal of Ageing >Comparative ageing research: a flourishing field in need of theoretical cultivation
【2h】

Comparative ageing research: a flourishing field in need of theoretical cultivation

机译:老化比较研究:需要理论培育的繁荣领域

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Comparative ageing research is a flourishing field, partly because of European funding in this area. Comparing different societies and cultures seems especially fruitful for the analysis of societal and cultural factors in development over the life course. From a nomothetic perspective, the aim of comparisons is the search for similarities and communalities in different societies and cultures; from an idiographic perspective, researchers are looking for societal and cultural specificity and distinctiveness. However, the potentials of comparative ageing research are not fully realized for the time being. In many cases, there is little theorizing as to whether there should be differences (or similarities) in ageing processes across countries, societies, or cultures. This paper discusses theoretical aims and ambitions of comparative ageing research in general. Comparative theories are sketched which could serve as a basis for comparative ageing research, and ageing theories are discussed which could be modified to be used in comparative research. The rationale of comparative ageing research is described and illustrated through empirical examples. Epistemological and methodological pitfalls (problems of conceptual, operational, functional, and measurement equivalence) are a substantial obstacle to comparative ageing research. Hence, merits and limitations of comparative designs and sampling procedures are considered.
机译:比较老化研究是一个蓬勃发展的领域,部分原因是欧洲在该领域提供了资金。比较不同的社会和文化似乎对分析一生中发展过程中的社会和文化因素特别有益。从名词学的角度来看,比较的目的是在不同的社会和文化中寻找相似点和共同点。从独特的角度来看,研究人员正在寻找社会和文化的特殊性和独特性。但是,目前尚不能完全实现比较老化研究的潜力。在许多情况下,关于国家,社会或文化之间的老龄化过程是否应该存在差异(或相似性)的理论很少。本文总体上讨论了比较老化研究的理论目标和抱负。勾勒出可作为比较老化研究基础的比较理论,并讨论了可以修改以用于比较研究的老化理论。通过经验例子来描述和说明比较性衰老研究的基本原理。认识论和方法论上的陷阱(概念上,操作上,功能上和测量上的对等问题)是比较老化研究的重大障碍。因此,考虑了比较设计和抽样程序的优缺点。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号