首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>The European Journal of General Practice >Validation of heart failure diagnosis registered in primary care records in two primary care centres in Barcelona (Spain) and factors related. A cross-sectional study
【2h】

Validation of heart failure diagnosis registered in primary care records in two primary care centres in Barcelona (Spain) and factors related. A cross-sectional study

机译:在西班牙巴塞罗那的两个初级保健中心的初级保健记录中注册的心力衰竭诊断的有效性及相关因素。横断面研究

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

>Background: Heart failure (HF) diagnosis as reported in primary care medical records is not always properly confirmed and could result in over-registration.>Objectives: To determine the proportion of registered HF that can be confirmed with information from primary care medical records and to analyse related factors.>Methods: A cross-sectional study. The medical records of 595 HF patients attended in two primary healthcare centres in Barcelona (Spain) were revised and validated by a team of experts who classified diagnosis into confirmed, unconfirmed, and misdiagnosis. Variables potentially related to the confirmation of the diagnosis were analysed. The revision of medical records and data collection took place from 15 January to 31 March 2014.>Results: Mean (standard deviation) age was 78 (10) years and 58% were women. The diagnosis could be confirmed in 53.6% of patients. Factors associated with a greater probability of having a confirmed diagnosis were age (yearly OR: 0.97, 95%CI: 0.95–0.99), cardiologist follow-up (OR: 3.66, 95%CI: 2.46–5.48), history of ischaemic heart disease (OR: 2.18, 95%CI: 1.36–2.48), atrial fibrillation (OR: 2.01, 95%CI: 1.34–3.03), and prescription of loop diuretics (OR: 3.24, 95%CI: 2.14–4.89).>Conclusion: Only in half of the patients labelled as HF in primary care medical records could this diagnosis be further confirmed. Variables regularly registered in clinical practice could help general practitioners identify those patients requiring a revision of their HF diagnosis.
机译:>背景:基层医疗记录中报告的心力衰竭(HF)诊断并非总是正确地进行,可能会导致注册过多。>目标:确定注册患者的比例可以通过基层医疗病历中的信息确认并分析相关因素的心衰。>方法:一项横断面研究。由专家组对在巴塞罗那(西班牙)两个主要医疗中心就诊的595名HF患者的病历进行了修订和验证,他们将诊断分为已确诊,未确诊和误诊。分析了可能与诊断确认有关的变量。病历和数据收集的修订于2014年1月15日至3月31日进行。>结果:平均(标准差)年龄为78(10)岁,女性为58%。 53.6%的患者可以确诊。与确诊可能性更大相关的因素是年龄(每年OR:0.97,95%CI:0.95-0.99),心脏病专家随访(OR:3.66,95%CI:2.46-5.48),缺血性心脏病史疾病(OR:2.18,95%CI:1.36-2.48),房颤(OR:2.01、95%CI:1.34-3.03)和prescription利尿剂处方(OR:3.24,95%CI:2.14-4.89)。 >结论:只有一半在基层医疗记录中被标记为HF的患者可以进一步确认该诊断。在临床实践中定期注册的变量可以帮助全科医生识别那些需要修订其HF诊断的患者。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号