首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>The European Journal of General Practice >Intensity of previous teaching but not diagnostic skills influences stigmatization of patients with substance use disorder by general practice residents. A vignette study among French final-year residents in general practice
【2h】

Intensity of previous teaching but not diagnostic skills influences stigmatization of patients with substance use disorder by general practice residents. A vignette study among French final-year residents in general practice

机译:先前的教学强度而非诊断技能会影响全科医师对药物滥用障碍患者的耻辱感。在法国普通高年级居民中进行的小插图研究

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

>Background: High levels of stigma towards patients with substance use disorder (SUD) have been found in health professionals and medical students.>Objectives: To assess the capability of residents in general practice to diagnose SUD correctly; to assess their stigmatization of patients with SUD and to assess the correlation between both variables. We hypothesized a negative correlation.>Methods: In 2014, we conducted a cross-sectional survey among French residents in general practice, using a self-administered questionnaire. First, a clinical case of SUD (tramadol) was presented, to assess the diagnosis and retained diagnostic criteria. A second clinical vignette was presented (intravenous heroin user) to assess stigmatization with the Attitudes to Mental Illness Questionnaire (AMIQ). Its score ranges from –10 (negative attitude) to +10 (positive attitude). AMIQ scores of residents who diagnosed SUD correctly versus incorrectly, and who had received at least six hours versus less than six hours of teaching on this topic, were compared using Student’s t-test.>Results: Of 1284 solicited residents, 303 participated (23.6%), 249 residents diagnosed SUD correctly (82.2%). The mean AMIQ score was –3.91 (SD 2.4) without significant difference regarding the correct diagnosis of SUD; but with a significant difference between residents who had received training in SUD for at least six hours versus residents less trained (AMIQ scores –3.76 (SD 2.46) versus −4.50 (SD 2.27), p = .0354).>Conclusion: Residents in general practice had a good capacity to diagnose SUD correctly but on average expressed negative attitudes toward people with SUD. More SUD teaching seems to help in reducing stigmatizing attitudes.
机译:>背景:在医疗专业人员和医学专业学生中,对药物滥用障碍(SUD)患者的污名化程度很高。>目标:评估居民在一般实践中的能力正确诊断SUD;评估他们对SUD患者的耻辱感,并评估两个变量之间的相关性。我们假设存在负相关。>方法: 2014年,我们使用自填问卷对法国居民进行了横断面调查。首先,介绍了SUD(曲马多)的临床病例,以评估诊断并保留诊断标准。提出了第二个临床小插曲(静脉注射海洛因),以评估“心理疾病态度调查表”(AMIQ)的污名。它的分数范围从–10(负面态度)到+10(正面态度)。使用学生t检验比较了正确诊断SUD或错误诊断SUD的居民以及接受了至少6个小时而不是少于6个小时的关于该主题的教学的居民的AMIQ得分。>结果:共计1284人居民303人(23.6%),正确诊断SUD的居民249人(82.2%)。 AMIQ的平均评分为–3.91(SD 2.4),对SUD的正确诊断无明显差异;但是接受过SUD至少六个小时培训的居民与受过较少培训的居民之间的差异显着(AMIQ评分为–3.76(SD 2.46)与−4.50(SD 2.27),p = .0354)。>结论: 在一般情况下,居民具有正确诊断SUD的良好能力,但平均而言,他们对SUD患者持消极态度。更多的SUD教学似乎有助于减少污名化的态度。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号