首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>European Spine Journal >Noncontiguous anterior decompression and fusion for multilevel cervical spondylotic myelopathy: a prospective randomized control clinical study
【2h】

Noncontiguous anterior decompression and fusion for multilevel cervical spondylotic myelopathy: a prospective randomized control clinical study

机译:非连续性前路减压融合治疗多级颈椎病:前瞻性随机对照临床研究

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Anterior decompression and fusion is an established procedure in surgical treatment for multilevel cervical spondylotic myelopathy (MCSM). However, contiguous corpectomies and fusion (CCF) often induce postoperative complications such as nonunion, graft subsidence, and loss of lordotic alignment. As an alternative, noncontiguous corpectomies or one-level corpectomy plus adjacent-level discectomy with retention of an intervening body has been developed recently. In this study, we prospectively compared noncontiguous anterior decompression and fusion (NADF) and CCF for MCSM in terms of surgical invasiveness, clinical and radiographic outcomes, and complications. From January 2005 to June 2007, 105 patients with MCSM were randomized to NADF group (n = 55) and CCF group (n = 50), and followed up for average 31.5 months (range 24–48 months). Average operative time and blood loss decreased significantly in the NADF group as compared with those in the CCF group (p < 0.05 and <0.001, respectively). For VAS, within 3 months postoperatively, there was no significant difference between the two groups. But at 6 months after surgery and final follow-up, VAS improved significantly in NADF group than that in CCF group (p < 0.05). No significant difference of JOA score was observed between the two groups at every collection time. In NADF group, all 55 cases obtained fusion at 1 year after operation (average 5.1 months). In CCF group, 48 cases achieved fusion 1 year postoperatively, but the other 2 cases were performed posterior stabilization and achieved fusion 6 months later. The differences of cervical lordosis between two groups were insignificant at the same follow-up time. But the loss of lordosis and height of fusion segments in 6 months postoperatively and final follow-up were significantly more in CFF group than in NADF group (p < 0.001). Complications were similar in both groups. But in CCF group three cases needed reoperation, one case with extradural hematoma was immediately re-operated after anterior decompression and two cases mentioned above were performed posterior stabilization at 1 year postoperatively. In conclusion, in the patients with MCSM, without developmental stenosis and continuous or combined ossification of posterior longitudinal ligaments, NADF and CCF showed an identical effect of decompression. In terms of surgical time, blood loss, VAS, fusion rate and cervical alignment, NADF was superior compared with CCF.
机译:前路减压和融合术是多级颈椎病脊髓病(MCSM)外科治疗的既定程序。但是,连续的透视和融合术(CCF)通常会引起术后并发症,例如骨不连,移植物下陷和脊柱前凸排列丢失。作为替代方案,近来已经开发出不连续的切除术或一级介入切除术加上邻近级间盘切除术并保留了介入的身体。在这项研究中,我们前瞻性地比较了非连续性前路减压融合术(NADF)和CCF对MCSM的手术侵袭性,临床和影像学结果以及并发症的影响。从2005年1月至2007年6月,将105例MCSM患者随机分为NADF组(n = 55)和CCF组(n = 50),平均随访31.5个月(24-48个月)。与CCF组相比,NADF组的平均手术时间和失血量明显减少(分别为p <0.05和<0.001)。对于VAS,术后3个月内两组之间无显着差异。但是在手术和最后的随访之后的6个月,NADF组的VAS显着高于CCF组(p <0.05)。在每个收集时间,两组之间的JOA得分均无显着差异。在NADF组中,所有55例在术后1年(平均5.1个月)获得融合。在CCF组中,有48例在术后1年实现了融合,但另外2例在进行了后路稳定并在6个月后实现了融合。两组在同一随访时间内颈椎前凸的差异无统计学意义。但是CFF组术后6个月和最后的随访中脊柱前凸丢失和融合节段高度明显高于NADF组(p <0.001)。两组的并发症相似。但是,CCF组中有3例需要再次手术,其中1例硬膜外血肿在前减压后立即再次手术,而上述2例在术后1年进行了后路稳定。总之,在MCSM患者中,无发展性狭窄且后纵韧带持续或合并骨化,NADF和CCF表现出相同的减压作用。在手术时间,失血量,VAS,融合率和颈椎排列方面,NADF优于CCF。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号