首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>European Spine Journal >Does size matter?A comparison of balloon-assisted less-invasive vs conventional retroperitoneal approach for anterior lumbar interbody fusion
【2h】

Does size matter?A comparison of balloon-assisted less-invasive vs conventional retroperitoneal approach for anterior lumbar interbody fusion

机译:大小重要吗?球囊辅助微创手术与传统腹膜后腹腔前路椎间融合术的比较

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

This is a case-series comparison of two approaches to anterior lumbar interbody fusion. A conventional open approach (COA) was compared with a balloon-assisted minimally invasive approach (BMI). Outcome measures included operating time, blood loss and complications. Secondary outcome measures included analgesia requirements, time to mobilization and inpatient stay. There were 17 females (7 COA, 10 BMI) and 18 males (9 COA and 9 BMI). Forty-five discs (21 COA, 24 BMI) in total were fused in 35 patients. There were significant differences (in favour of the BMI) in the overall operating time between the COA and the BMI, and the single level COA and the BMI. There was no inter-group difference in the PCA requirements either overall or between one or two-level operations. The less invasive approach did have a benefit in earlier mobilization of the single-level fusions.
机译:这是对两种前腰椎椎间融合术的病例系列比较。将传统的开放式入路(COA)与球囊辅助的微创入路(BMI)进行了比较。结果指标包括手术时间,失血量和并发症。次要结果指标包括镇痛要求,动员时间和住院时间。有17位女性(7 COA,10 BMI)和18位男性(9 COA和9 BMI)。 35例患者总共融合了45个椎间盘(21个COA,24个BMI)。 COA和BMI以及单级COA和BMI之间的总体运行时间存在显着差异(有利于BMI)。总体而言,PCA要求之间或一级或二级操作之间的组间差异都没有。侵入性较小的方法在早期动员单级融合确实有好处。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号