首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Evidence-Based Spine-Care Journal >Anterior cervical discectomy and fusion for the management of axial neck pain in the absence of radiculopathy or myelopathy
【2h】

Anterior cervical discectomy and fusion for the management of axial neck pain in the absence of radiculopathy or myelopathy

机译:在无神经根病或脊髓病的情况下颈椎前路椎间盘切除术和融合术可治疗轴向颈痛

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

>Study design: Systematic review>Study rationale: Anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) is a proven, effective treatment for relieving neck pain due to degenerative conditions of the cervical spine. Since most patients also present with radiculopathy or myelopathy, little is known as to the effectiveness of ACDF to relieve pain and improve function in patients without radicular or myelopathic symptoms.>Objective: To examine the clinical outcome in patients undergoing (ACDF) for axial neck pain without radicular or myelopathic symptoms.>Methods: A systematic review was undertaken for articles published up to March 2010. Electronic databases and reference lists of key articles were searched to identify studies evaluating ACDF for the treatment of axial neck pain only. Radiculopathy and myelopathy, patients who suffered severe trauma, or with tumor/metastatic disease or infection were excluded. Two independent reviewers assessed the strength of evidence using the grading of recommendations assessment, development and evaluation (GRADE) system, and disagreements were resolved by consensus.>Results: No comparative studies were identified. Three case series met our inclusion criteria and were evaluated. All studies showed a mean improvement of pain of at least 50% approximately 4-years following surgery. Functional outcomes improved between 32% and 52% from baseline. Most patients reported satisfaction with surgery, 56% in one study and 79% in another. Complications varied among studies ranging from 1% to 10% and included pseudoarthrosis (9%), nonunion and revision (3%) and screw removal (1%).>Conclusion: There is low evidence suggesting that patients with axial neck pain without radicular or myelopathic symptoms may receive some improvement in pain and function following ACDF. However, whether this benefit is greater than nontreatment or other treatments cannot be determined with the present literature.
机译:>研究设计:系统评价>研究依据:颈椎前路椎间盘切除术和融合术(ACDF)是一种行之有效的缓解颈椎退行性疾病引起的颈部疼痛的治疗方法。由于大多数患者还患有神经根病或脊髓病,因此对于无神经根或骨髓病症状的患者,ACDF缓解疼痛和改善功能的功效鲜为人知。>目的:检查接受过神经根除颤术的患者的临床结局(ACDF)用于治疗无放射性或骨髓性症状的轴颈疼痛。>方法:对截至2010年3月的文章进行了系统的综述。检索了电子数据库和关键文章的参考文献清单,以鉴定评估ACDF的研究仅用于治疗轴向颈痛。神经根病和脊髓病,遭受严重创伤或患有肿瘤/转移性疾病或感染的患者被排除在外。两名独立的审阅者使用推荐评估,开发和评估(GRADE)系统的等级来评估证据的强度,并通过共识解决了分歧。>结果:未发现比较研究。三个病例系列符合我们的纳入标准并进行了评估。所有研究均显示术后约4年疼痛平均改善至少50%。功能结果较基线改善了32%至52%。大多数患者对手术满意,其中一项研究占56%,另一项研究占79%。研究中并发症的发生范围从1%到10%不等,包括假性关节炎(9%),骨不连和翻修(3%)和螺钉移除(1%)。>结论:证据不足,表明该患者伴有无根性或脊髓病症状的轴向颈痛可能在ACDF后疼痛和功能得到改善。然而,该益处是否大于未治疗或其他治疗尚不能用本文献确定。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号