首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Evidence-based Complementary and Alternative Medicine : eCAM >Integrating Traditional Chinese Medicine Services in Community Health Centers: Insights into Utilization Patterns in the Pearl River Region of China
【2h】

Integrating Traditional Chinese Medicine Services in Community Health Centers: Insights into Utilization Patterns in the Pearl River Region of China

机译:在社区卫生中心整合中医服务:对中国珠江三角洲地区利用模式的见解

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

In China's healthcare reform, community health centers (CHCs) are designed to take a pivotal role in providing primary care. Whilst about 20% of all outpatient care in China is delivered by the traditional Chinese medicine (TCM) sector, hospitals, instead of CHCs, are major providers. Using current patterns of patient utilization this study aims to inform CHCs on how they may strengthen access to TCM services. Three thousand three hundred and sixty CHC patients from six cities within the urban Pearl Delta Region were enumerated using multistage cluster sampling. Fifty-two percent had visited herbalists within three months with a mean visit frequency of 1.50 times. Herbal treatments, which are cheaper than western medicines, were more popular amongst those who needed to pay out of pocket including the uninsured. Herbal medicines appeared to be an alternative for those who are underinsured. Acupuncturists and massage therapists were visited by smaller proportions, 6.58% and 5.98%, respectively, with a mean three-month visit of 0.27 and 0.26 times. Access was restricted by lack of social insurance coverage. Whilst increasing provision of TCM in CHCs might respond to patient demand, increasing insurance coverage for TCM needs to be evaluated using current evidence on safety and effectiveness.
机译:在中国的医疗保健改革中,社区保健中心(CHC)旨在在提供初级保健方面发挥关键作用。尽管中国所有门诊护理中约20%由中医(TCM)部门提供,但医院而不是CHC是主要提供者。本研究旨在利用当前的患者利用模式,向CHC告知他们如何加强对中医服务的访问。使用多阶段整群抽样对来自珠三角地区六个城市的366名CHC患者进行了计数。 52%的受访者在三个月内拜访了中医师,平均拜访频率为1.50倍。比西药便宜的草药疗法在那些需要自付费用的人(包括未投保的人)中更受欢迎。对于那些保险不足的人,草药似乎是一种替代选择。针灸师和按摩治疗师的拜访比例较小,分别为6.58%和5.98%,平均三个月的拜访次数为0.27和0.26次。由于缺乏社会保险,访问受到限制。虽然在中医中提供更多的中药可能会满足患者的需求,但是需要使用有关安全性和有效性的最新证据来评估中医的保险范围。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号