首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Evidence-based Complementary and Alternative Medicine : eCAM >Evaluating Complementary Therapies for Canine Osteoarthritis Part I: Green-lipped Mussel (Perna canaliculus)
【2h】

Evaluating Complementary Therapies for Canine Osteoarthritis Part I: Green-lipped Mussel (Perna canaliculus)

机译:评估犬骨关节炎的补充疗法第一部分:唇唇青口贻贝(Perna canaliculus)

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

A green-lipped mussel (GLM) preparation was evaluated in a randomized, double-controlled and double-blinded clinical trial. It was hypothesized that the treatment effect would be less than that of the positive control (carprofen) but more than that of the negative control (placebo). Forty-five dogs with chronic pain and a radiographic diagnosis of osteoarthritis that were randomly allocated into one of three groups completed the study. All dogs were fed the test products or placebo for 8 weeks. The dogs were evaluated four times, at 4-week intervals. Six different variables were assessed: veterinary-assessed mobility index, two force plate variables, owner-evaluated chronic pain index and pain as well as locomotion visual analogue scales (VASs). Intake of extra carprofen was also evaluated. A chi-squared and a Mann–Whitney test were used to determine significance between groups. When changed to dichotomous variables, there were more dogs in the GLM than in the placebo group that improved, according to veterinary-assessed mobility, owner-evaluated chronic pain index and pain VAS (P = 0.031, P = 0.025, P = 0.011, respectively). For the same three, the odds ratio and their confidence interval were over one. The extent of improvement was significantly different between the GLM and the control in veterinary-assessed mobility (P = 0.012) and pain VAS (P = 0.004). In conclusion, GLM alleviated chronic orthopedic pain in dogs although it was not as effective as carprofen. As no side-effects were detected, GLM may be beneficial in dogs e.g. when non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs cannot be used.
机译:在一项随机,双对照和双盲临床试验中评估了唇唇青口(GLM)制剂。假设治疗效果将小于阳性对照(卡洛芬)但大于阴性对照(安慰剂)。随机分为三组之一的四十五只患有慢性疼痛并经放射学诊断为骨关节炎的狗完成了研究。给所有的狗喂食测试产品或安慰剂8周。以4周的间隔对狗进行四次评估。评估了六个不同的变量:兽医评估的活动指数,两个测力板变量,所有者评估的慢性疼痛指数和疼痛以及运动视觉模拟量表(VAS)。还评估了额外的卡洛芬的摄入量。卡方检验和曼惠特尼检验用于确定组之间的显着性。根据兽医评估的活动能力,所有者评估的慢性疼痛指数和疼痛VAS,在更改为二分变量后,GLM中的狗多于安慰剂组,但有所改善(P = 0.031,P = 0.025,P = 0.011,分别)。对于相同的三者,优势比及其置信区间均大于一。 GLM和对照组在兽医评估的活动性(P = 0.012)和疼痛VAS(P = 0.004)之间的改善程度差异显着。总之,尽管GLM不如卡洛芬有效,但可以减轻狗的慢性骨科疼痛。由于未检测到副作用,因此GLM对狗例如狗可能有益。当无法使用非甾体类抗炎药时。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号