...
首页> 外文期刊>Evidence-based complementary and alternative medicine: eCAM >Evaluating Complementary Therapies for Canine Osteoarthritis Part I: Green-lipped Mussel (Perna canaliculus).
【24h】

Evaluating Complementary Therapies for Canine Osteoarthritis Part I: Green-lipped Mussel (Perna canaliculus).

机译:评估犬骨关节炎的辅助疗法第一部分:唇唇青口的贻贝(Perna canaliculus)。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

A green-lipped mussel (GLM) preparation was evaluated in a randomized, double-controlled and double-blinded clinical trial. It was hypothesized that the treatment effect would be less than that of the positive control (carprofen) but more than that of the negative control (placebo). Forty-five dogs with chronic pain and a radiographic diagnosis of osteoarthritis that were randomly allocated into one of three groups completed the study. All dogs were fed the test products or placebo for 8 weeks. The dogs were evaluated four times, at 4-week intervals. Six different variables were assessed: veterinary-assessed mobility index, two force plate variables, owner-evaluated chronic pain index and pain as well as locomotion visual analogue scales (VASs). Intake of extra carprofen was also evaluated. A chi-squared and a Mann-Whitney test were used to determine significance between groups. When changed to dichotomous variables, there were more dogs in the GLM than in the placebo group that improved, according to veterinary-assessed mobility, owner-evaluated chronic pain index and pain VAS (P = 0.031, P = 0.025, P = 0.011, respectively). For the same three, the odds ratio and their confidence interval were over one. The extent of improvement was significantly different between the GLM and the control in veterinary-assessed mobility (P = 0.012) and pain VAS (P = 0.004). In conclusion, GLM alleviated chronic orthopedic pain in dogs although it was not as effective as carprofen. As no side-effects were detected, GLM may be beneficial in dogs e.g. when non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs cannot be used.
机译:在一项随机,双对照和双盲临床试验中评估了唇唇青口(GLM)制剂。假设治疗效果将小于阳性对照(卡洛芬)但大于阴性对照(安慰剂)。随机分为三组之一的四十五只患有慢性疼痛和放射学诊断为骨关节炎的狗完成了研究。给所有的狗喂食测试产品或安慰剂8周。每4周对狗进行四次评估。评估了六个不同的变量:兽医评估的活动指数,两个测力板变量,所有者评估的慢性疼痛指数和疼痛以及运动视觉模拟量表(VAS)。还评估了额外的卡洛芬的摄入量。卡方检验和曼惠特尼检验用于确定组之间的显着性。根据兽医评估的活动性,所有者评估的慢性疼痛指数和疼痛VAS,将GLM更改为二分变量后,比安慰剂组的狗多于安慰剂组(P = 0.031,P = 0.025,P = 0.011分别)。对于相同的三者,优势比及其置信区间均大于一。 GLM与对照组在兽医评估的活动性(P = 0.012)和疼痛性VAS(P = 0.004)上的改善程度差异显着。总之,尽管GLM不如卡洛芬有效,但可以减轻狗的慢性骨科疼痛。由于未检测到副作用,因此GLM对狗例如狗可能有益。当无法使用非甾体类抗炎药时。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号