首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Extreme Physiology Medicine >Are we being drowned in hydration advice? Thirsty for more?
【2h】

Are we being drowned in hydration advice? Thirsty for more?

机译:我们被水合作用淹没了吗?渴了吗?

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Hydration pertains simplistically to body water volume. Functionally, however, hydration is one aspect of fluid regulation that is far more complex, as it involves the homeostatic regulation of total body fluid volume, composition and distribution. Deliberate or pathological alteration of these regulated factors can be disabling or fatal, whereas they are impacted by exercise and by all environmental stressors (e.g. heat, immersion, gravity) both acutely and chronically. For example, dehydration during exercising and environmental heat stress reduces water volume more than electrolyte content, causing hyperosmotic hypohydration. If exercise continues for many hours with access to food and water, composition returns to normal but extracellular volume increases well above baseline (if exercising upright and at low altitude). Repeating bouts of exercise or heat stress does likewise. Dehydration due to physical activity or environmental heat is a routine fluid-regulatory stress. How to gauge such dehydration and — more importantly—what to do about it, are contested heavily within sports medicine and nutrition. Drinking to limit changes in body mass is commonly advocated (to maintain ≤2% reduction), rather than relying on behavioural cues (mainly thirst) because the latter has been deemed too insensitive. This review, as part of the series on moving in extreme environments, critiques the validity, problems and merits of externally versus autonomously controlled fluid-regulatory behaviours, both acutely and chronically. Our contention is that externally advocated hydration policies (especially based on change in body mass with exercise in healthy individuals) have limited merit and are extrapolated and imposed too widely upon society, at the expense of autonomy. More research is warranted to examine whether ad libitum versus avid drinking is beneficial, detrimental or neither in: acute settings; adapting for obligatory dehydration (e.g. elite endurance competition in the heat), and; development of chronic diseases that are associated with an extreme lack of environmental stress.
机译:水合作用简单地涉及体内的水量。然而,在功能上,水合作用是流体调节的一个方面,要复杂得多,因为它涉及体内总流体体积,组成和分布的体内调节。这些调节因素的蓄意或病理改变可能会致死或致命,而运动和所有环境压力因素(例如热量,沉浸感,重力)都会对其造成急性和慢性影响。例如,运动和环境热应激期间的脱水会比电解质减少更多的水量,从而导致高渗性水合作用不足。如果在获得食物和水的情况下持续运动数小时,则成分会恢复正常,但细胞外体积会大大增加至基线以上(如果在竖直和低海拔下运动)。重复运动或热应激也是如此。由于体育活动或环境热而引起的脱水是一种常规的流体调节性压力。在运动医学和营养学领域,如何衡量这种脱水以及更重要的是如何处理脱水问题备受争议。通常提倡饮酒以限制体重变化(保持≤2%的减少),而不是依靠行为提示(主要是口渴),因为后者被认为太不敏感了。作为在极端环境中移动的系列文章的一部分,本篇评论对急性和慢性的外部控制与自主控制的液体调节行为的有效性,问题和优点进行了批评。我们的论点是,外部倡导的水合作用政策(尤其是基于健康个体在锻炼过程中体重的变化)具有有限的优点,被推论和过于广泛地应用在社会上,以牺牲自主权为代价。有必要进行更多的研究来检查随意饮酒与狂饮是否有益,有害或两者皆有:适应强制性脱水(例如在高温下的精英耐力比赛);以及与极端缺乏环境压力有关的慢性疾病的发展。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号