首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience >Compassion meditators show less anger less punishment and more compensation of victims in response to fairness violations
【2h】

Compassion meditators show less anger less punishment and more compensation of victims in response to fairness violations

机译:同情者冥想者表现出更少的愤怒更少的惩罚和更多的受害者赔偿以应对违反公正的行为

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Fairness violations elicit powerful behavioral and affective responses. Indeed, people are willing to incur costs to sanction unfair behavior. Here we study the possible impact of long-term mental training in socio-affective capacities such as compassion on altruistic punishment and compensatory behavior in economic games. To this end we recruited a group of long-term meditation practitioners (LTPs) who had engaged in an average of 40 K h of mental training exercises including compassion-related meditation, along with a group of meditation-naïve controls. Participants played several adaptations of the dictator game in which they had the opportunity to punish the dictator both when they were the recipients of the dictator's offer and when they were third-party witnesses to the dictator's treatment of an anonymous second player. Compared to controls, LTPs were less likely to punish when they were the victims of fairness violations. However, both groups punished equivalently when they witnessed others receiving unfair treatment. In post-task questionnaires, controls reported significantly more anger in response to unfair offers than LTPs, although fairness judgments did not differ between groups. These data suggest that because the LTPs were less angered by unfair treatment of themselves, they punished that behavior less. However, when they witnessed the unfair treatment of others, they engaged in norm-reinforcing punishment. Finally, when participants played an additional game which included the opportunity to recompense victims, LTPs were more likely to do so. Together these data point to differential approaches to justice whereby LTPs engaged less in vengeful, retributive justice and focused more on norm reinforcement and the restoration of equity. These differences suggest that social preferences are plastic and that altruistic responses to unfairness may be shaped by the prolonged cultivation of prosocial motivation, altruism, and compassion.
机译:违反公平原则会引起强有力的行为和情感反应。确实,人们愿意为制裁不正当行为付出代价。在这里,我们研究了长期心理培训对社会情感能力(如同情心)对经济游戏中利他惩罚和补偿行为的可能影响。为此,我们招募了一组长期冥想从业者(LTP),他们从事了平均40 K h的心理训练,包括与同情相关的冥想,以及一组天真的冥想控制。参与者对独裁者游戏进行了几处改编,他们有机会惩罚独裁者,既可以接受独裁者的要约,又可以作为独裁者对待匿名第二玩家的第三方见证。与对照相比,长期合作伙伴在成为违反公平原则的受害者时,惩罚的可能性较小。但是,当他们目睹其他人受到不公平待遇时,这两个群体都受到同等的惩罚。在任务后调查表中,尽管公平判断在两组之间没有差异,但控制人员报告说,他们对不公平提议的愤怒明显多于长期不接纳。这些数据表明,由于LTP对自己的不公平对待的愤怒较少,因此他们对这种行为的惩罚更少。但是,当他们目睹对他人的不公正待遇时,便进行了规范化的惩罚。最终,当参与者玩额外的游戏,其中包括赔偿受害者的机会时,长期合作伙伴更有可能这样做。这些数据加在一起表明采取不同的司法方法,从而使长期发展计划减少了对复仇和报应性司法的参与,而更多地侧重于加强规范和恢复公平。这些差异表明,社会偏好是可塑性的,并且对亲社会动机,利他主义和同情心的长期培养可能会影响利他对不公平的反应。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号