首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Frontiers in Human Neuroscience >A comparison of two sleep spindle detection methods based on all night averages: individually adjusted vs. fixed frequencies
【2h】

A comparison of two sleep spindle detection methods based on all night averages: individually adjusted vs. fixed frequencies

机译:两种基于夜间平均值的睡眠纺锤体检测方法的比较:单独调整频率与固定频率

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Sleep spindles are frequently studied for their relationship with state and trait cognitive variables, and they are thought to play an important role in sleep-related memory consolidation. Due to their frequent occurrence in NREM sleep, the detection of sleep spindles is only feasible using automatic algorithms, of which a large number is available. We compared subject averages of the spindle parameters computed by a fixed frequency (FixF) (11–13 Hz for slow spindles, 13–15 Hz for fast spindles) automatic detection algorithm and the individual adjustment method (IAM), which uses individual frequency bands for sleep spindle detection. Fast spindle duration and amplitude are strongly correlated in the two algorithms, but there is little overlap in fast spindle density and slow spindle parameters in general. The agreement between fixed and manually determined sleep spindle frequencies is limited, especially in case of slow spindles. This is the most likely reason for the poor agreement between the two detection methods in case of slow spindle parameters. Our results suggest that while various algorithms may reliably detect fast spindles, a more sophisticated algorithm primed to individual spindle frequencies is necessary for the detection of slow spindles as well as individual variations in the number of spindles in general.
机译:人们经常研究睡眠纺锤与状态和特质认知变量之间的关系,并认为它们在与睡眠有关的记忆巩固中起重要作用。由于它们经常在NREM睡眠中发生,因此仅使用自动算法对睡眠纺锤进行检测是可行的,而自动算法数量众多。我们比较了通过固定频率(FixF)(慢速主轴为11–13 Hz,快速主轴为13–15 Hz)自动检测算法和使用单个频段的单独调整方法(IAM)计算得出的主轴参数的主题平均值。用于睡眠主轴检测。快速主轴持续时间和振幅在这两种算法中密切相关,但是通常快速主轴密度和慢速主轴参数几乎没有重叠。固定和手动确定的睡眠纺锤频率之间的一致性受到限制,尤其是在纺锤慢的情况下。如果主轴参数很慢,这是两种检测方法之间不一致的最可能原因。我们的结果表明,尽管各种算法都可以可靠地检测快速主轴,但对于慢速主轴以及主轴数量的个体变化,需要一种针对单个主轴频率的更为复杂的算法。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号