首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Frontiers in Genetics >Weighted Gene Co-expression Network Analysis of Endometriosis and Identification of Functional Modules Associated With Its Main Hallmarks
【2h】

Weighted Gene Co-expression Network Analysis of Endometriosis and Identification of Functional Modules Associated With Its Main Hallmarks

机译:子宫内膜异位症的加权基因共表达网络分析和与其主要特征相关的功能模块的鉴定

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Although many genes have been identified using high throughput technologies in endometriosis (ES), only a small number of individual genes have been analyzed functionally. This is due to the complexity of the disease that has different stages and is affected by various genetic and environmental factors. Many genes are upregulated or downregulated at each stage of the disease, thus making it difficult to identify key genes. In addition, little is known about the differences between the different stages of the disease. We assumed that the study of the identified genes in ES at a system-level can help to better understand the molecular mechanism of the disease at different stages of the development. We used publicly available microarray data containing archived endometrial samples from women with minimal/mild endometriosis (MMES), mild/severe endometriosis (MSES) and without endometriosis. Using weighted gene co-expression analysis (WGCNA), functional modules were derived from normal endometrium (NEM) as the reference sample. Subsequently, we tested whether the topology or connectivity pattern of the modules was preserved in MMES and/or MSES. Common and specific hub genes were identified in non-preserved modules. Accordingly, hub genes were detected in the non-preserved modules at each stage. We identified sixteen co-expression modules. Of the 16 modules, nine were non-preserved in both MMES and MSES whereas five were preserved in NEM, MMES, and MSES. Importantly, two non-preserved modules were found in either MMES or MSES, highlighting differences between the two stages of the disease. Analyzing the hub genes in the non-preserved modules showed that they mostly lost or gained their centrality in NEM after developing the disease into MMES and MSES. The same scenario was observed, when the severeness of the disease switched from MMES to MSES. Interestingly, the expression analysis of the new selected gene candidates including CC2D2A, AEBP1, HOXB6, IER3, and STX18 as well as IGF-1, CYP11A1 and MMP-2 could validate such shifts between different stages. The overrepresented gene ontology (GO) terms were enriched in specific modules, such as genetic disposition, estrogen dependence, progesterone resistance and inflammation, which are known as endometriosis hallmarks. Some modules uncovered novel co-expressed gene clusters that were not previously discovered.
机译:尽管已使用子宫内膜异位症(ES)中的高通量技术鉴定了许多基因,但仅对少数单个基因进行了功能分析。这是由于该疾病的复杂性具有不同的阶段,并受各种遗传和环境因素的影响。在疾病的每个阶段,许多基因被上调或下调,因此很难鉴定关键基因。另外,对于疾病的不同阶段之间的差异知之甚少。我们认为,在系统水平上对ES中已鉴定基因的研究有助于更好地了解疾病在不同发展阶段的分子机制。我们使用了公开的微阵列数据,这些数据包含来自具有最小/轻度子宫内膜异位症(MMES),轻度/重度子宫内膜异位症(MSES)和没有子宫内膜异位症的女性的子宫内膜样本。使用加权基因共表达分析(WGCNA),功能模块来自正常子宫内膜(NEM)作为参考样品。随后,我们测试了模块的拓扑或连接模式是否保留在MMES和/或MSES中。在非保留模块中鉴定了常见和特定的集线器基因。因此,在每个阶段在非保留模块中检测到毂基因。我们确定了十六个共表达模块。在16个模块中,有9个在MMES和MSES中均未保留,而有5个在NEM,MMES和MSES中已保留。重要的是,在MMES或MSES中发现了两个未保留的模块,突出了该疾病两个阶段之间的差异。分析未保存模块中的中枢基因,发现它们在将疾病发展成MMES和MSES后,在NEM中大部分丢失或占据中心地位。当疾病的严重性从MMES转变为MSES时,也观察到了相同的情况。有趣的是,对新选择的候选基因(包括CC2D2A,AEBP1,HOXB6,IER3和STX18以及IGF-1,CYP11A1和MMP-2)的表达分析可以验证不同阶段之间的这种转移。过度代表的基因本体论(GO)术语丰富了特定的模块,例如遗传配置,雌激素依赖性,孕激素抵抗和炎症,这被称为子宫内膜异位症的标志。一些模块发现了以前未发现过的新型共表达基因簇。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号