首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Korean Journal of Anesthesiology >Comparison of the Proseal LMA and intersurgical I-gel during gynecological laparoscopy
【2h】

Comparison of the Proseal LMA and intersurgical I-gel during gynecological laparoscopy

机译:妇科腹腔镜检查中前乳LMA和I术间凝胶的比较

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

BackgroundThe relatively recently developed I-gel (Intersurgical Ltd., Workingham, England) is a supraglottic airway device designed for single-use that, unlike conventional LMAs, does not require an inflatable cuff. In addition, the I-gel, much like the Proseal LMA (PLMA), has a gastric drainage tube associated with an upper tube for decompression of the stomach, thereby avoiding acid reflux and decreasing the risk of pulmonary absorption. The purpose of this study was to compare PLMA and I-gel devices in patients undergoing gynecological laparoscopy based on sealing pressure before and during pneumoperitoneum, insertion time, and gas exchange.
机译:背景技术相对较新开发的I-gel(Intersurgical Ltd.,英国Workingham)是一种声门上气道装置,专为一次性使用而设计,与传统的LMA不同,它不需要充气套囊。此外,I-gel与Proseal LMA(PLMA)一样,具有胃排泄管和上管,用于胃减压,从而避免了胃酸反流并降低了肺吸收的风险。这项研究的目的是根据气腹前后的密封压力,插入时间和气体交换情况,比较接受妇科腹腔镜检查的患者的PLMA和I-gel设备。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号