首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Frontiers in Neural Circuits >Comparison of the dynamics of neural interactions between current-based and conductance-based integrate-and-fire recurrent networks
【2h】

Comparison of the dynamics of neural interactions between current-based and conductance-based integrate-and-fire recurrent networks

机译:基于电流和基于电导的集成射击递归网络之间神经交互动力学的比较

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Models of networks of Leaky Integrate-and-Fire (LIF) neurons are a widely used tool for theoretical investigations of brain function. These models have been used both with current- and conductance-based synapses. However, the differences in the dynamics expressed by these two approaches have been so far mainly studied at the single neuron level. To investigate how these synaptic models affect network activity, we compared the single neuron and neural population dynamics of conductance-based networks (COBNs) and current-based networks (CUBNs) of LIF neurons. These networks were endowed with sparse excitatory and inhibitory recurrent connections, and were tested in conditions including both low- and high-conductance states. We developed a novel procedure to obtain comparable networks by properly tuning the synaptic parameters not shared by the models. The so defined comparable networks displayed an excellent and robust match of first order statistics (average single neuron firing rates and average frequency spectrum of network activity). However, these comparable networks showed profound differences in the second order statistics of neural population interactions and in the modulation of these properties by external inputs. The correlation between inhibitory and excitatory synaptic currents and the cross-neuron correlation between synaptic inputs, membrane potentials and spike trains were stronger and more stimulus-modulated in the COBN. Because of these properties, the spike train correlation carried more information about the strength of the input in the COBN, although the firing rates were equally informative in both network models. Moreover, the network activity of COBN showed stronger synchronization in the gamma band, and spectral information about the input higher and spread over a broader range of frequencies. These results suggest that the second order statistics of network dynamics depend strongly on the choice of synaptic model.
机译:渗漏整合和射击(LIF)神经元网络模型是对脑功能进行理论研究的一种广泛使用的工具。这些模型已与基于电流和基于电导的突触一起使用。但是,到目前为止,主要在单个神经元水平研究了这两种方法所表达的动力学差异。为了研究这些突触模型如何影响网络活动,我们比较了LIF神经元的基于电导的网络(COBN)和基于电流的网络(CUBN)的单个神经元和神经种群动态。这些网络具有稀疏的兴奋性和抑制性反复连接,并在包括低电导率状态和高电导率状态的条件下进行了测试。我们开发了一种新颖的程序,可以通过适当调整模型未共享的突触参数来获得可比较的网络。如此定义的可比网络显示出一阶统计数据(平均单个神经元放电速率和网络活动的平均频谱)的出色且强大的匹配。但是,这些可比网络在神经种群相互作用的二阶统计量以及外部输入对这些属性的调节中显示出巨大的差异。在COBN中,抑制性和兴奋性突触电流之间的相关性以及突触输入,膜电位和尖峰序列之间的交叉神经元相关性更强,并且受刺激程度更高。由于这些特性,尽管两个网络模型中的触发率同样具有参考价值,但峰值序列相关性携带了更多有关COBN中输入强度的信息。此外,COBN的网络活动在伽马波段显示出更强的同步性,有关输入的频谱信息更高,并且分布在更宽的频率范围内。这些结果表明网络动力学的二阶统计量强烈依赖于突触模型的选择。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号