首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience >Are We There Yet? Exploring the Impact of Translating Cognitive Tests for Dementia Using Mobile Technology in an Aging Population
【2h】

Are We There Yet? Exploring the Impact of Translating Cognitive Tests for Dementia Using Mobile Technology in an Aging Population

机译:我们到了吗?探索移动技术对老年痴呆症翻译认知测验的影响

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

This study examines implications of the expanded use of mobile platforms in testing cognitive function, and generates evidence on the impact utilizing mobile platforms for dementia screen. The Saint Louis University Mental State examination (SLUMS) was ported onto a computerized mobile application named the Cambridge University Pen to Digital Equivalence assessment (CUPDE). CUPDE was piloted and compared to the traditional pen and paper version, with a common comparator test for both groups. Sixty healthy participants (aged 50–79) completed both measurements. Differences were tested between overall outcomes, individual items, and relationship with the comparator. Significant differences in the overall scores between the two testing versions as well as within individual items were observed. Even when groups were matched by cognitive function and age, scores on SLUMS original version (M = 19.75, SD = 3) were significantly higher than those on CUPDE (M = 15.88, SD = 3.5), t(15) = 3.02, p < 0.01. Mobile platforms require the development of new normative standards, even when items can be directly translated. Furthermore, these must fit aging populations with significant variance in familiarity with mobile technology. Greater understanding of the interplay and related mechanisms between auditory and visual systems, which are not well understood yet in the context of mobile technologies, is mandatory.
机译:这项研究检查了在测试认知功能中扩展使用移动平台的含义,并就利用移动平台对痴呆症筛查的影响产生了证据。圣路易斯大学精神状态考试(SLUMS)已移植到名为剑桥大学笔对数字等效性评估(CUPDE)的计算机化移动应用程序中。对CUPDE进行了试点,并与传统的笔和纸版本进行了比较,两组均进行了通用的比较器测试。 60名健康参与者(50-79岁)完成了两项测量。测试了总体结果,单个项目以及与比较者的关系之间的差异。观察到两个测试版本之间以及单个项目中的总体得分存在显着差异。即使各组的认知功能和年龄相匹配,SLUMS原始版本的得分(M = 19.75,SD = 3)也明显高于CUPDE的得分(M = 15.88,SD = 3.5),t(15)= 3.02,p <0.01。移动平台需要开发新的规范标准,即使可以直接翻译项目。此外,这些必须适合对移动技术熟悉程度差异很大的老龄化人群。必须对听觉和视觉系统之间的相互作用和相关机制有更深入的了解,这在移动技术的背景下还没有得到很好的理解。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号