首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Frontiers in Neurology >Strength or Motor Control: What Matters in High-Functioning Stroke?
【2h】

Strength or Motor Control: What Matters in High-Functioning Stroke?

机译:强度或电机控制:高功能冲程有什么作用?

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

>Background: The two primary motor impairments that hinder function after stroke are declines in strength and motor control. The impact of motor impairments on functional capacity may vary with the severity of stroke motor impairments. In this study, we focus on high-functioning stroke individuals who experience mild to moderate motor impairments and often resume prior activities or return to work. These tasks require the ability to move independently, placing high demands on their functional mobility. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to quantify impairments in strength and motor control and their contribution to functional mobility in high-functioning stroke.>Methods:Twenty-one high-functioning stroke individuals (Fugl Meyer Lower Extremity Score = 28.67 ± 4.85; Functional Activity Index = 28.47 ± 7.04) and 21 age-matched healthy controls participated in this study. To examine motor impairments in strength and motor control, participants performed the following tasks with the paretic ankle (1) maximum voluntary contractions (MVC) and (2) visuomotor tracking of a sinusoidal trajectory. Strength was quantified as the maximum force produced during ankle plantarflexion and dorsiflexion. Motor control was quantified as (a) the accuracy and (b) variability of ankle movement during the visuomotor tracking task. For functional mobility, participants performed (1) overground walking for 7 meters and (2) simulated driving task. Functional mobility was determined by walking speed, stride length variability, and braking reaction time.>Results: Compared with the controls, the stroke group showed decreased plantarflexion strength, decreased accuracy, and increased variability of ankle movement. In addition, the stroke group demonstrated decreased walking speed, increased stride length variability, and increased braking reaction time. The multiple-linear regression model revealed that motor accuracy was a significant predictor of the walking speed and braking reaction time. Further, motor variability was a significant predictor of stride length variability. Finally, the dorsiflexion or plantarflexion strength did not predict walking speed, stride length variability or braking reaction time.>Conclusions: The impairments in motor control but not strength predict functional deficits in walking and driving in high-functioning stroke individuals. Therefore, rehabilitation interventions assessing and improving motor control will potentially enhance functional outcomes in high-functioning stroke survivors.
机译:>背景:阻碍中风后功能的两个主要运动障碍是力量下降和运动控制。运动障碍对功能能力的影响可能会随着中风运动障碍的严重程度而变化。在这项研究中,我们重点研究轻度至中度运动障碍并经常恢复先前的活动或重返工作的高功能卒中患者。这些任务要求能够独立移动,从而对其功能移动性提出了很高的要求。因此,本研究的目的是量化高功能性卒中的强度和运动控制障碍及其对功能性活动的贡献。>方法:二十一名高功能性卒中患者(Fugl Meyer下肢得分= 28.67±4.85;功能活动指数= 28.47±7.04)和21位年龄相匹配的健康对照组参加了这项研究。为了检查力量和运动控制中的运动障碍,参与者使用假性踝关节执行以下任务:(1)最大自愿收缩(MVC)和(2)正弦轨迹的视觉运动跟踪。强度被量化为在踝plant屈和背屈期间产生的最大力。运动控制被量化为(a)视觉运动追踪任务期间踝关节运动的准确性和(b)变异性。为了实现功能机动性,参与者进行了(1)地面步行7米和(2)模拟驾驶任务。功能强度由步行速度,步幅可变性和制动反应时间决定。>结果:与对照组相比,卒中组足底屈肌强度降低,准确性降低,踝关节运动变异性增加。此外,中风组表现出步行速度降低,步幅可变性增加以及制动反应时间增加。多元线性回归模型表明,电机精度是步行速度和制动反应时间的重要预测指标。此外,运动变异性是步幅变异性的重要预测指标。最后,背屈强度或足底屈曲强度不能预测步行速度,步幅变化或制动反应时间。>结论:运动控制障碍而不是强度预测高功能性卒中的步行和驾驶功能缺陷个人。因此,评估和改善运动控制的康复干预措施可能会增强高功能卒中幸存者的功能结局。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号