首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Frontiers in Neurology >Factors Influencing Decision Making for Carotid Endarterectomy versus Stenting in the Very Elderly
【2h】

Factors Influencing Decision Making for Carotid Endarterectomy versus Stenting in the Very Elderly

机译:影响老年人颈动脉内膜切除术与支架置入的决策因素

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

As the population ages worldwide, the number of elderly patients with carotid stenosis is also increasing. There have been many large clinical trials comparing carotid endarterectomy (CAE) versus stenting, but the inclusion criteria (i.e., symptomatic or asymptomatic), stenting methods (i.e., protection device), and primary end point (i.e., the definition of myocardial infarction and follow-up period) were different between trials. Therefore, the interpretation of those results is difficult and requires attention. When it comes to age, the patients older than 80 years were excluded or stratified to a high risk group in previous landmark trials. However, a recent guideline recommended that endarterectomy may be associated with lower stroke risk compared with carotid artery stenting in patients older than 70 years with symptomatic carotid disease. The annual risk of stroke in individuals with asymptomatic carotid stenosis is about 1–3% but the risk is about 4–12% with symptomatic stenosis without carotid intervention. Although the outcome of CAE is better than that of carotid stenting in patients older than 70 years, the perioperative risk is higher in older patients. Therefore, it is important to classify high risk patients and consider underlying disability and life expectancy of very elderly patients before deciding whether to undergo a carotid intervention. In addition, we should also consider that the stroke rate with intensive medical treatment is unknown and is currently being investigated in randomized controlled trials. Intensive medical treatment includes high intensity statins, diabetes and blood pressure control, and aggressive antiplatelet treatment. The aim of this review is to report the factors that may be responsible for the variability in the treatment of carotid stenosis, particularly in the elderly population. This will allow the readers to integrate the current available evidence to individualize the treatment of carotid stenosis in this challenging population.
机译:随着世界人口的老龄化,患有颈动脉狭窄的老年患者也在增加。有许多大型临床试验将颈动脉内膜切除术(CAE)与支架置入术进行比较,但是纳入标准(即有症状或无症状),支架置入方法(即保护装置)和主要终点(即心肌梗死和随访期)在试验之间是不同的。因此,对这些结果的解释很困​​难,需要引起注意。关于年龄,在以前的里程碑试验中,年龄大于80岁的患者被排除或分层为高风险组。但是,最近的指南建议,对于有症状的颈动脉疾病的70岁以上患者,与颈动脉支架置入术相比,动脉内膜切除术可能具有较低的中风风险。无症状性颈动脉狭窄患者的中风年风险约为1-3%,而有症状性狭窄而无颈动脉介入的风险约为4-12%。尽管70岁以上的患者CAE的结果优于颈动脉支架置入术,但老年患者的围手术期风险更高。因此,在决定是否接受颈动脉介入治疗之前,对高危患者进行分类并考虑老年患者的潜在残疾和预期寿命很重要。此外,我们还应考虑到强化治疗的卒中发生率尚不清楚,目前正在随机对照试验中进行研究。强化医疗包括高强度他汀类药物,糖尿病和血压控制以及积极的抗血小板治疗。这篇综述的目的是报告可能导致颈动脉狭窄治疗变异性的因素,特别是在老年人群中。这将使读者能够整合当前可用的证据,以个性化在这一具有挑战性的人群中对颈动脉狭窄的治疗。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号