首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Frontiers in Neurology >Notification Strategy and Predictors of Outcome in Stroke Ineligible for Reperfusion Therapies
【2h】

Notification Strategy and Predictors of Outcome in Stroke Ineligible for Reperfusion Therapies

机译:不适合再灌注治疗的中风通知策略和结果预测因子

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

>Background, Objective: At least 70% of all stroke patients are ineligible for recanalization therapy. We identified predictors of outcome among these patients, with special focus on notification of emergency medical services (EMS).>Methods: We prospectively collected data of 250 consecutive patients with acute cerebrovascular diseases ineligible for recanalization therapy. Initial notification strategy and outcome were analyzed by regression models.>Results: EMS notification rate was 55, 41, and 21% in patients with <6, 6–24, and >24 h stroke-to-door time. Atrial fibrillation (AF; OR = 2.66, 95% CI: 1.19–5.96), stroke severity (National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale score, NIHSS; OR = 1.12, 95% CI: 1.02–1.23), history of any psychiatric disease (OR = 2.2, 95% CI: 0.98–4.97), aphasia (OR = 1.99, 95% CI: 0.99–3.98), and residence type were predictors of EMS notification. Disability (modified Rankin Scale score [mRS]) both at discharge and at 1 year was associated with age, admission NIHSS score, type of cerebrovascular disorder, and pre-stroke mRS at discharge and discharge mRS at follow-up. Age (HR = 1.05, 95% CI: 1.02–1.08) and NIHSS (HR = 1.16, 95% CI: 1.12–1.21) had a significant effect on the relative hazard of death.>Conclusions: EMS notification is influenced by AF, stroke severity, psychiatric disease, aphasia, and residence type. Early disability depends on age, the type and severity of the stroke, and pre-stroke mRS. Predictors of disability at 1 year after stroke are age, stoke severity, mRS at discharge, and recurrent ischemic stroke. Higher NIHSS and older age are associated with higher case fatality. In patients ineligible for recanalization, EMS notification had no significant effect on outcome, regarding both disability and survival.
机译:>背景,目的:所有中风患者中至少有70%不符合再通治疗的资格。我们确定了这些患者的预后指标,特别关注紧急医疗服务(EMS)的通知。>方法:我们前瞻性收集了250例不适合进行再通气治疗的连续性急性脑血管疾病患者的数据。通过回归模型分析了初始通知策略和结果。>结果:卒中至门诊时间<6、6-24和> 24 h的患者,EMS通知率分别为55%,41%和21%时间。心房颤动(AF; OR = 2.66,95%CI:1.19–5.96),中风严重度(美国国立卫生研究院卒中量表评分,NIHSS; OR = 1.12,95%CI:1.02-1.23),任何精神疾病史( OR = 2.2、95%CI:0.98–4.97),失语症(OR = 1.99、95%CI:0.99–3.98)和居住类型是EMS通知的预测指标。出院时和1年时的残疾(改良的Rankin量表评分[mRS])均与年龄,入院NIHSS评分,脑血管疾病类型,出院前中风mRS和随访时出院mRS相关。年龄(HR = 1.05,95%CI:1.02-1.08)和NIHSS(HR = 1.16,95%CI:1.12-1.21)对死亡的相对危险性有显着影响。>结论: EMS通知受房颤,中风严重性,精神病,失语症和居住类型的影响。早期残疾取决于年龄,中风的类型和严重程度以及中风前的mRS。中风后1年残障的预测因素是年龄,中风严重程度,出院时的mRS和复发性缺血性中风。较高的NIHSS和较高的年龄与较高的病死率相关。在不适合再次通气的患者中,就残疾和生存而言,EMS通知对结局无明显影响。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号