首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Frontiers in Neuroscience >Comparison of tactile auditory and visual modality for brain-computer interface use: a case study with a patient in the locked-in state
【2h】

Comparison of tactile auditory and visual modality for brain-computer interface use: a case study with a patient in the locked-in state

机译:脑-计算机接口使用的触觉听觉和视觉方式的比较:患者处于锁定状态的案例研究

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

This paper describes a case study with a patient in the classic locked-in state, who currently has no means of independent communication. Following a user-centered approach, we investigated event-related potentials (ERP) elicited in different modalities for use in brain-computer interface (BCI) systems. Such systems could provide her with an alternative communication channel. To investigate the most viable modality for achieving BCI based communication, classic oddball paradigms (1 rare and 1 frequent stimulus, ratio 1:5) in the visual, auditory and tactile modality were conducted (2 runs per modality). Classifiers were built on one run and tested offline on another run (and vice versa). In these paradigms, the tactile modality was clearly superior to other modalities, displaying high offline accuracy even when classification was performed on single trials only. Consequently, we tested the tactile paradigm online and the patient successfully selected targets without any error. Furthermore, we investigated use of the visual or tactile modality for different BCI systems with more than two selection options. In the visual modality, several BCI paradigms were tested offline. Neither matrix-based nor so-called gaze-independent paradigms constituted a means of control. These results may thus question the gaze-independence of current gaze-independent approaches to BCI. A tactile four-choice BCI resulted in high offline classification accuracies. Yet, online use raised various issues. Although performance was clearly above chance, practical daily life use appeared unlikely when compared to other communication approaches (e.g., partner scanning). Our results emphasize the need for user-centered design in BCI development including identification of the best stimulus modality for a particular user. Finally, the paper discusses feasibility of EEG-based BCI systems for patients in classic locked-in state and compares BCI to other AT solutions that we also tested during the study.
机译:本文介绍了一个案例研究,该案例研究的患者处于经典锁定状态,目前尚无法独立沟通。遵循以用户为中心的方法,我们研究了在脑机接口(BCI)系统中使用的不同方式引起的事件相关电位(ERP)。这样的系统可以为她提供替代的交流渠道。为了研究实现基于BCI的交流的最可行方式,在视觉,听觉和触觉方式中进行了经典的奇数球范例(1种罕见刺激和1种频繁刺激,比率1:5)(每种方式进行2次跑步)。分类器基于一次运行构建,并在另一次运行中脱机测试(反之亦然)。在这些范例中,触觉模态明显优于其他模态,即使仅在单个试验中进行分类,也显示出很高的离线精度。因此,我们在线测试了触觉范例,患者成功选择了目标,没有任何错误。此外,我们调查了视觉或触觉方式在具有两个以上选择选项的不同BCI系统中的使用。在视觉模式中,一些BCI范例已离线测试。基于矩阵或独立于注视的范例都不能构成控制手段。因此,这些结果可能会质疑当前BCI的独立于视线的方法的视线独立性。触觉四选择式BCI导致较高的离线分类精度。然而,在线使用引发了各种问题。尽管性能明显高于偶然性,但与其他沟通方式(例如伴侣扫描)相比,实际使用日常生活似乎不太可能。我们的结果强调在BCI开发中需要以用户为中心的设计,包括确定特定用户的最佳刺激方式。最后,本文讨论了基于EEG的BCI系统在经典锁定状态下患者的可行性,并将BCI与我们在研究期间也测试过的其他AT解决方案进行了比较。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号