首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Frontiers in Neuroscience >Complete Locked-in and Locked-in Patients: Command Following Assessment and Communication with Vibro-Tactile P300 and Motor Imagery Brain-Computer Interface Tools
【2h】

Complete Locked-in and Locked-in Patients: Command Following Assessment and Communication with Vibro-Tactile P300 and Motor Imagery Brain-Computer Interface Tools

机译:完全锁定和锁定的患者:评估后与Vibro-Tactile P300和运动图像脑机接口工具进行通信的命令

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Many patients with locked-in syndrome (LIS) or complete locked-in syndrome (CLIS) also need brain-computer interface (BCI) platforms that do not rely on visual stimuli and are easy to use. We investigate command following and communication functions of mindBEAGLE with 9 LIS, 3 CLIS patients and three healthy controls. This tests were done with vibro-tactile stimulation with 2 or 3 stimulators (VT2 and VT3 mode) and with motor imagery (MI) paradigms. In VT2 the stimulators are fixed on the left and right wrist and the participant has the task to count the stimuli on the target hand in order to elicit a P300 response. In VT3 mode an additional stimulator is placed as a distractor on the shoulder and the participant is counting stimuli either on the right or left hand. In motor imagery mode the participant is instructed to imagine left or right hand movement. VT3 and MI also allow the participant to answer yes and no questions. Healthy controls achieved a mean assessment accuracy of 100% in VT2, 93% in VT3, and 73% in MI modes. They were able to communicate with VT3 (86.7%) and MI (83.3%) after 2 training runs. The patients achieved a mean accuracy of 76.6% in VT2, 63.1% in VT3, and 58.2% in MI modes after 1–2 training runs. 9 out of 12 LIS patients could communicate by using the vibro-tactile P300 paradigms (answered on average 8 out of 10 questions correctly) and 3 out of 12 could communicate with the motor imagery paradigm (answered correctly 4,7 out of 5 questions). 2 out of the 3 CLIS patients could use the system to communicate with VT3 (90 and 70% accuracy). The results show that paradigms based on non-visual evoked potentials and motor imagery can be effective for these users. It is also the first study that showed EEG-based BCI communication with CLIS patients and was able to bring 9 out of 12 patients to communicate with higher accuracies than reported before. More importantly this was achieved within less than 15–20 min.
机译:许多患有锁定综合征(LIS)或完全锁定综合征(CLIS)的患者还需要不依赖视觉刺激且易于使用的脑机接口(BCI)平台。我们调查了9名LIS,3名CLIS患者和3名健康对照者的mindBeAGLE的命令遵循和交流功能。这项测试是使用2或3个刺激器(VT2和VT3模式)的振动式刺激以及运动图像(MI)范例进行的。在VT2中,刺激器固定在左右手腕上,参与者有任务计算目标手上的刺激,以引起P300响应。在VT3模式下,附加的刺激器将作为干扰物放置在肩膀上,并且参与者在右手或左手上计数刺激。在运动成像模式下,指示参与者想象左手或右手的运动。 VT3和MI还允许参与者回答是和否问题。健康对照在VT2中的平均评估准确性达到100%,在VT3中达到93%,在MI模式下达到73%。经过两次训练,他们能够与VT3(86.7%)和MI(83.3%)进行通信。经过1-2次训练后,患者在VT2中的平均准确率达到76.6%,在VT3中达到63.1%,在MI模式中达到58.2%。 12名LIS患者中有9名可以使用触觉P300范例进行交流(平均正确回答了10个问题中的8个),而12名中有3名可以与运动图像范例进行了交流(正确回答了5个问题中的4,7个) 。 3名CLIS患者中有2名可以使用该系统与VT3通信(准确率分别为90%和70%)。结果表明,基于非视觉诱发电位和运动图像的范例对于这些用户可能是有效的。这也是第一项显示基于脑电图的BCI与CLIS患者进行交流的研究,并且能够使12位患者中的9位以更高的准确度进行交流。更重要的是,这可以在不到15至20分钟的时间内完成。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号