首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Frontiers in Pharmacology >Safety and Effectiveness of Bivalirudin in Patients Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
【2h】

Safety and Effectiveness of Bivalirudin in Patients Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

机译:比伐卢定在经皮冠状动脉介入治疗中的安全性和有效性:系统评价和荟萃分析

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Recent clinical trials have shown that while bivalirudin exhibits similar efficacy with heparin, it offers several advantages over heparin, such as a better safety profile. We aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of bivalirudin use during Percutaneous Coronary Intervention (PCI) in the treatment of angina and acute coronary syndrome (ACS). We searched the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) in the Cochrane Library, PubMed, EMBASE, and Science Direct from January 1980 to January 2016. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing bivalirudin to heparin during the course of PCI in patients with angina or ACS were included. Outcome measures included all-cause mortality, myocardial infarction, revascularisation, stent thrombosis, stroke, and major bleeding. The selection, quality assessment, and data extraction of the included trials were done independently by four authors, and disagreements were resolved by consensus. Pooled relative risk (RR) estimates and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated. A total of 12 RCTs involving 44,088 subjects were included. Bivalirudin appeared to be non-superior compared to heparin in reducing all-cause mortality, myocardial infarction, revascularisation, and stroke. Bivalirudin appeared to be related to a higher risk of stent thrombosis when compared to heparin plus provisional use of a glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitor (GPI) at day 30 (RR 1.94 [1.16, 3.24] p < 0.01). Overall, bivalirudin-based regimens present a lesser risk of major bleeding (RR 0.56 [0.44–0.71] p < 0.001), and Thrombolysis In Myocardial Infarction (TIMI) major bleeding (RR 0.56 [0.43–0.73]) compared with heparin-based regimens either with provisional or routine use of a GPI. However, the magnitude of TIMI major bleeding effect varied greatly (p < 0.001), depending on whether a GPI was provisionally used (RR 0.42 [0.34–0.52] p < 0.001) or routinely used (RR 0.60 [0.43 –0.83] p < 0.001), in the heparin arm. This meta-analysis demonstrated that bivalirudin is associated with a lower risk of major bleeding, but a higher risk of stent thrombosis compared to heparin.
机译:最近的临床试验表明,比伐卢定与肝素具有相似的疗效,但比肝素具有多种优势,例如安全性更高。我们旨在评估经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)期间使用比伐卢定治疗心绞痛和急性冠脉综合征(ACS)的有效性和安全性。我们从1980年1月至2016年1月在Cochrane图书馆,PubMed,EMBASE和Science Direct中搜索了Cochrane对照试验中央注册系统(CENTRAL)。比较了在心绞痛患者PCI过程中比伐卢定和肝素对比伐卢定和肝素的随机对照试验(RCT)。或ACS都包括在内。结果指标包括全因死亡率,心肌梗塞,血运重建,支架血栓形成,中风和大出血。纳入试验的选择,质量评估和数据提取均由四位作者独立完成,分歧通过共识解决。计算合并的相对风险(RR)估计值和95%置信区间(CIs)。总共包括12项RCT,涉及44,088名受试者。在降低全因死亡率,心肌梗塞,血运重建和中风方面,比伐卢定与肝素相比似乎没有优势。与肝素和在第30天临时使用糖蛋白IIb / IIIa抑制剂(GPI)相比,比伐卢定似乎与较高的支架内血栓形成风险相关(RR 1.94 [1.16,3.24] p <0.01)。总体而言,与基于肝素的方案相比,基于比伐卢定的方案大出血的风险(RR 0.56 [0.44–0.71] p <0.001)和心肌梗塞溶栓(TIMI)的大出血风险较小(RR 0.56 [0.43-0.73])。临时或常规使用GPI的治疗方案。但是,TIMI主要出血效应的大小差异很大(p <0.001),这取决于是临时使用GPI(RR 0.42 [0.34-0.52] p <0.001)还是常规使用GPI(RR 0.60 [0.43 –0.83] p <0.001) 0.001),在肝素臂中。这项荟萃分析表明,与肝素相比,比伐卢定与大出血的风险较低,但支架血栓形成的风险较高。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号