首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Frontiers in Pharmacology >Effects of Intensive Control of Glycemia on Clinical Kidney Outcomes in Type 2 Diabetes Patients Compared with Standard Control: A Meta-Analysis
【2h】

Effects of Intensive Control of Glycemia on Clinical Kidney Outcomes in Type 2 Diabetes Patients Compared with Standard Control: A Meta-Analysis

机译:严格控制血糖对2型糖尿病患者临床肾脏结局的影响与标准对照组相比的荟萃分析

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

>Background: Association between poor control of glycemia and the onset of microvascular complications in type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) patients is a hard issue. However, it seems that the impact of pharmacological treatment is important only in early stages of diabetic nephropathy. We sought to examine whether intensive glycemic control is associated with improvement of clinical Chronic Kidney Disease (CKD) outcomes compared to standard glycemic control.>Methods: Meta-analysis of published and unpublished randomized controlled trials (RCT) and post-hoc analysis of RCTs comparing anti-diabetic drugs and/or insulin (intensive control) vs. dietary measures (standard control) for relevant outcomes related to progression of CKD clinically manifest was undertaken. Summary estimates obtained by random effects model and funnel plots for assessing reporting bias are presented.>Results: Our analysis was based on four RCTs representing 27,391 adult T2DM patients with CKD from around the world. The pooled OR for the outcomes of doubling of serum creatinine and need of dialysis were, respectively, of 0.98 with 95% confidence interval (95% CI) 0.81–1.19, and 0.84 with 95% CI 0.69–1.02. The pooled OR for the outcome of death from kidney failure was 0.62 with 95% CI 0.39–0.98. Clinical differences between studies were not translated in statistical heterogeneity. Reporting bias may be present.>Conclusions: Intensive glycemic control has an effect on death from kidney failure compared to standard glycemic control. Better comprehension of glycemic control effects on both T2DM patients with and without CKD is important for individualization of these two treatment modalities.
机译:>背景: 2型糖尿病(T2DM)患者的血糖控制不佳与微血管并发症的发作之间的联系是一个难题。然而,似乎仅在糖尿病性肾病的早期阶段,药物治疗的影响才是重要的。我们试图检查与标准血糖控制相比,强化血糖控制是否与临床慢性肾脏病(CKD)结果改善相关。进行了RCT的事后分析,比较了抗糖尿病药物和/或胰岛素(强化对照)与饮食措施(标准对照)之间与CKD临床表现相关的相关结局。给出了通过随机效应模型和漏斗图获得的摘要估计值,以评估报告偏差。>结果:我们的分析基于代表世界各地27,391名CKD成人T2DM患者的四个RCT。血清肌酐加倍和需要透析的结果的合并OR分别为0.98和95%置信区间(95%CI)0.81–1.19,以及0.84和95%CI 0.69–1.02。合并肾衰竭导致死亡的OR为0.62,95%CI为0.39-0.98。研究之间的临床差异未转化为统计异质性。 >结论:与标准血糖控制相比,强化血糖控制对肾衰竭死亡的影响较大。对于有或没有CKD的T2DM患者,更好地理解血糖控制效果对于个体化这两种治疗方式很重要。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号