首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Frontiers in Psychology >How Do Incentives Lead to Deception in Advisor–Client Interactions? Explicit and Implicit Strategies of Self-Interested Deception
【2h】

How Do Incentives Lead to Deception in Advisor–Client Interactions? Explicit and Implicit Strategies of Self-Interested Deception

机译:激励如何导致顾问与客户互动中的欺骗?自我欺骗的显性和隐性策略

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

When confronted with important questions we like to rely on the advice of experts. However, uncertainty can occur regarding advisors’ motivation to pursue self-interest and deceive the client. This can especially occur when the advisor has the possibility to receive an incentive by recommending a certain alternative. We investigated how the possibility to pursue self-interest led to explicit strategic behavior (bias in recommendation and transfer of information) and to implicit strategic behavior (bias in information processing: evaluation and memory). In Study 1 explicit strategic behavior could be identified: self-interested advisors recommended more often the self-serving alternative and transferred more self-interested biased information to their client compared to the advisor without specific interest. Also deception through implicit strategic behavior was identified: self-interested advisors biased the evaluation of information less in favor of the client compared to the control group. Self-interested advisors also remembered conflicting information regarding their self-interest worse compared to advisors without self-interest. In Study 2 beside self-interest we assessed accountability which interacted with self-interest and increased the bias: when accountability was high advisor’s self-interest led to higher explicit strategic behavior (less transfer of conflicting information), and to higher implicit strategic behavior (devaluated and remembered less conflicting information). Both studies identified implicit strategic behavior as mediator which can explain the relation between self-interest and explicit strategic behavior. Results of both studies suggest that self-interested advisors use explicit and implicit strategic behavior to receive an incentive. Thus, advisors do not only consciously inform their clients “self-interested,” but they are influenced unconsciously by biased information processing – a tendency which even increased with high accountability.
机译:当遇到重要问题时,我们希望依靠专家的建议。但是,顾问追求自身利益和欺骗客户的动机可能会不确定。当顾问有可能通过推荐某个替代方案来获得激励时,这尤其可能发生。我们调查了追求自我利益的可能性如何导致明确的战略行为(推荐和信息传递中的偏见)和隐性战略行为(信息处理中的偏见:评估和记忆)。在研究1中,可以识别出明确的战略行为:与没有特定兴趣的顾问相比,利己的顾问更经常推荐自助服务的选择,并将更多的利己的偏见信息传递给他们的客户。还发现了通过隐性策略行为的欺骗:与对照组相比,自私的顾问对信息的评估偏向于对客户的偏爱。与没有私利的顾问相比,具有私利的顾问还记得有关自身利益的冲突信息。在研究2中,除了自我利益之外,我们还评估了与自我利益互动并增加偏见的问责制:当问责制很高时,顾问的自我利益导致更高的显式战略行为(较少的冲突信息传递)和更高的隐性战略行为(贬值,并记住较少的冲突信息)。两项研究都将隐性战略行为作为调解人,可以解释自我利益与显性战略行为之间的关系。两项研究的结果都表明,自私的顾问会使用显性和隐性的战略行为来获得激励。因此,顾问不仅会自觉地告知客户“自身利益”,而且还会受到有偏见的信息处理的无意识影响-这种趋势甚至随着高度的责任感而增加。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号