首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Frontiers in Veterinary Science >Comparison of Two Rift Valley Fever Serological Tests in Cameroonian Cattle Populations Using a Bayesian Latent Class Approach
【2h】

Comparison of Two Rift Valley Fever Serological Tests in Cameroonian Cattle Populations Using a Bayesian Latent Class Approach

机译:贝叶斯潜伏类方法在喀麦隆牛种群中的两个裂谷热血清学测试的比较

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Rift Valley Fever is an important zoonotic viral disease of livestock occurring across much of Africa causing acute febrile illness, abortion, and neonatal death in livestock particularly sheep and cattle and a range of disease in humans from mild flu-like symptoms to more severe haemorrhagic fever and death. Understanding the epidemiology requires well-evaluated tools including antibody detection ELISAs. It is well-recognized that tests developed in one population do not necessarily perform as well when used in different populations and it is therefore important to assess tests in the populations in which they are to be used. Here we describe the performance of a commercial RVF ELISA (ID.Vet) and an in-house plaque reduction neutralization test (PRNT80). A Bayesian no gold standard latent class model for two tests and ≥2 populations based on the Hui-Walter model was used to estimate the test parameters using a range of populations based on geographical separation and age to assess consistency of performance across different sub-populations. The ID.Vet ELISA had an estimated diagnostic sensitivity (Se) of 0.854 (0.655–0.991 95%BCI) and specificity (Sp) of 0.986 (0.971–0.998 95%BCI) using all the data and splitting the population by geographical region compared to 0.844 (0.660–0.973 95%BCI) and 0.981 (0.965–0.996 95%BCI) for the PRNT80. There was slight variation in the mean Se and Sp in different sub-populations mainly in Se estimates due to small numbers of positives in the sub-populations but the 95% BCI generally overlapped suggesting a very consistent performance across the different geographical areas and ages of animals. This is one of few reports of serological evidence of RVF in Central Africa and strongly suggests the virus is actively circulating in this cattle population. This has important public health implications and RVF should be considered as a differential in both livestock disease cases as well as human febrile cases in West and Central Africa not just East Africa. We also demonstrate that the performance of the commercial ELISA is comparable to the PRNT80 but has the advantages of speed, lower cost and no containment needs making it a much more useful test for low and middle income settings (LMICs).
机译:裂谷热是一种重要的人畜共患病毒病,遍及非洲很多地方,引起牲畜,特别是绵羊和牛的急性发热疾病,流产和新生儿死亡,以及人类的一系列疾病,从轻度流感样症状到更严重的出血热和死亡。了解流行病学需要评估良好的工具,包括抗体检测ELISA。众所周知,在一个人群中开发的测试在不同人群中使用时不一定会表现良好,因此,重要的是评估要在其中使用的人群中的测试。在这里,我们描述了商用RVF ELISA(ID.Vet)和内部噬斑减少中和测试(PRNT80)的性能。使用基于Hui-Walter模型的两个测试和≥2个种群的贝叶斯无金标准潜在类别模型,使用基于地理分隔和年龄的一系列种群来估计测试参数,以评估不同亚种群的表现一致性。 ID.Vet ELISA使用所有数据并按地理区域划分人群时,估计诊断灵敏度(Se)为0.854(0.655–0.991 95%BCI),特异性(Sp)为0.986(0.971–0.998 95%BCI) PRNT80分别为0.844(0.660-0.973 95%BCI)和0.981(0.965-0.996 95%BCI)。不同亚群的平均Se和Sp略有差异,主要是由于亚群的阳性数少,但Se估计值高,但是95%的BCI通常重叠,表明在不同地理区域和年龄段的表现非常一致。动物。这是中非RVF血清学证据的少数报道之一,强烈表明该病毒正在这一牛群中活跃传播。这具有重要的公共卫生影响,因此,在西非和中非,不仅是东非,家畜疾病病例和人类高热病例都应考虑RVF。我们还证明了商用ELISA的性能可与PRNT80媲美,但具有速度快,成本低和无需遏制的优点,这使其成为中低收入人群(LMIC)更加有用的测试。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号