首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>G3: GenesGenomesGenetics >Application of Response Surface Methods To Determine Conditions for Optimal Genomic Prediction
【2h】

Application of Response Surface Methods To Determine Conditions for Optimal Genomic Prediction

机译:响应面法在确定最佳基因组预测条件中的应用

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

An epistatic genetic architecture can have a significant impact on prediction accuracies of genomic prediction (GP) methods. Machine learning methods predict traits comprised of epistatic genetic architectures more accurately than statistical methods based on additive mixed linear models. The differences between these types of GP methods suggest a diagnostic for revealing genetic architectures underlying traits of interest. In addition to genetic architecture, the performance of GP methods may be influenced by the sample size of the training population, the number of QTL, and the proportion of phenotypic variability due to genotypic variability (heritability). Possible values for these factors and the number of combinations of the factor levels that influence the performance of GP methods can be large. Thus, efficient methods for identifying combinations of factor levels that produce most accurate GPs is needed. Herein, we employ response surface methods (RSMs) to find the experimental conditions that produce the most accurate GPs. We illustrate RSM with an example of simulated doubled haploid populations and identify the combination of factors that maximize the difference between prediction accuracies of best linear unbiased prediction (BLUP) and support vector machine (SVM) GP methods. The greatest impact on the response is due to the genetic architecture of the population, heritability of the trait, and the sample size. When epistasis is responsible for all of the genotypic variance and heritability is equal to one and the sample size of the training population is large, the advantage of using the SVM method vs. the BLUP method is greatest. However, except for values close to the maximum, most of the response surface shows little difference between the methods. We also determined that the conditions resulting in the greatest prediction accuracy for BLUP occurred when genetic architecture consists solely of additive effects, and heritability is equal to one.
机译:上位遗传结构可能对基因组预测(GP)方法的预测准确性产生重大影响。与基于加性混合线性模型的统计方法相比,机器学习方法可以更准确地预测由上位遗传结构构成的特征。这些类型的GP方法之间的差异提示了一种诊断,可揭示潜在特征的遗传结构。除遗传结构外,GP方法的性能还可能受训练人群的样本量,QTL数量以及由于基因型变异性(遗传性)而导致的表型变异性的比例的影响。这些因素的可能值以及影响GP方法性能的因素水平组合的数量可能很大。因此,需要有效的方法来鉴定产生最精确GP的因子水平的组合。在这里,我们采用响应面方法(RSM)来找到产生最精确GP的实验条件。我们以一个模拟的双单倍体种群为例说明了RSM,并确定了使最佳线性无偏预测(BLUP)和支持向量机(SVM)GP方法的预测准确性之间的差异最大化的因素的组合。对反应的最大影响是由于种群的遗传结构,性状的遗传性和样本量。当上位性是所有基因型变异的原因,并且遗传力等于1并且训练人群的样本量很大时,使用SVM方法和BLUP方法的优势最大。但是,除了接近最大值的值外,大多数响应表面在这两种方法之间显示的差异很小。我们还确定,当遗传结构仅由加性效应组成且遗传力等于1时,就会出现导致BLUP预测准确性最高的条件。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号