首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>GMS German Medical Science >The scholar role in the National Competence Based Catalogues of Learning Objectives for Undergraduate Medical Education (NKLM) compared to other international frameworks
【2h】

The scholar role in the National Competence Based Catalogues of Learning Objectives for Undergraduate Medical Education (NKLM) compared to other international frameworks

机译:与其他国际框架相比该学者在基于国家能力的本科医学教育学习目标目录(NKLM)中的学者角色

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

>Background: In Germany, a national competence based catalogue of learning objectives in medicine (NKLM) was developed by the Society for Medical Education and the Council of Medical Faculties. As many of its international counterparts the NKLM describes the qualifications of medical school graduates. The definition of such outcome frameworks indents to make medical education transparent to students, teachers and society. The NKLM aims to amend existing lists of medical topics for assessment with learnable competencies. All outcome frameworks are structured into chapters, domains or physician roles. The definition of the scholar-role poses a number of questions such as: What distinguishes necessary qualifications of a scientifically qualified physician from those of a medical scientist? >Methods: 13 outcome frameworks were identified through a systematic three-step literature review and their content compared to the scholar role in the NKLM by means of a qualitative text analysis. The three steps consist of (1) search for outcome frameworks, (2) in- and exclusion, and (3) data extraction, categorization, and validation. The results were afterwards matched with the scholar role of the NKLM.>Results: Extracted contents of all frameworks may be summarized into the components Common Basics, Clinical Application, Research, Teaching and Education, and Lifelong Learning. Compared to the included frameworks the NKLM emphasises competencies necessary for research and teaching while clinical application is less prominently mentioned. >Conclusion: The scholar role of the NKLM differs from other international outcome frameworks. Discussing these results shall increase propagation and understanding of the NKLM and thus contribute to the qualification of future medical graduates in Germany.
机译:>背景:在德国,医学教育学会和医学学院理事会制定了基于国家能力的医学学习目标目录(NKLM)。与许多国际同行一样,NKLM描述了医学院毕业生的资格。此类结果框架的定义旨在使医学教育对学生,教师和社会透明。 NKLM旨在修改现有医学主题列表,以具有可学习的能力进行评估。所有结果框架都按章,领域或医生角色进行组织。学者角色的定义提出了许多问题,例如:什么区别了具有科学资格的医师和医学家的必要资格? >方法:通过系统的三步文献审查,鉴定了13个结果框架,并通过定性文本分析将其内容与NKLM中学者的角色进行了比较。这三个步骤包括:(1)搜索结果框架,(2)内入和排除,以及(3)数据提取,分类和验证。随后,结果与NKLM的学者角色相匹配。>结果:所有框架的提取内容可以概括为“通用基础知识”,“临床应用”,“研究,教学和教育”以及“终身学习”。与所包含的框架相比,NKLM强调研究和教学所必需的能力,而临床应用则很少被提及。 >结论:NKLM的学者角色与其他国际成果框架不同。讨论这些结果将增加对NKLM的传播和了解,从而有助于提高德国未来医学毕业生的资格。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号