首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Geriatrics >The Older Driver with Cognitive Impairment: Perceptions of Driving Ability and Results of a Behind the Wheel Test
【2h】

The Older Driver with Cognitive Impairment: Perceptions of Driving Ability and Results of a Behind the Wheel Test

机译:认知障碍的老年驾驶员:驾驶能力的感知和车轮测试的结果

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Older adult drivers with cognitive impairment pose a potential safety risk to themselves and others. Providers are often uncertain about when to request a formal evaluation of driving ability, leaving subjective reports of concerns by the patient or family as common initiators of objective driving evaluation referral. This observational study evaluated the correspondence of patient and caregiver report of driving concerns relative to objective behind-the-wheel (BTW) testing. Data were analyzed from occupational therapy driving evaluations of older adult U.S. Veterans referred from cognitive disorder specialty clinics between 2005 and 2015 (n = 151). Driving ability was evaluated with a pre-testing interview of the patient and a knowledgeable caregiver, followed by objective BTW testing. Patients referred had a mean age of 77.6 (SD = 8.1) years, were 97% male, and 98% white. Results demonstrated that most patients are evaluated for driving concerns far too late, with only 3% of the sample being evaluated as independent to drive without restrictions, and 38% recommended to retire from driving. Although both patients and caregivers denied specific driving concerns (obey signs and lights) relative to objective testing, caregiver concerns were greater than their respective patient’s concerns (p < 0.001) and were associated with road test outcome (p = 0.001).
机译:患有认知障碍的成年驾驶员对自己和他人构成潜在的安全风险。提供者通常不确定何时要求对驾驶能力进行正式评估,而将患者或家属的主观报告作为客观驾驶评估转介的常见发起者。这项观察性研究评估了与客观后轮驱动(BTW)测试相关的患者和护理人员关于驾驶问题的报告的对应关系。数据来自2005年至2015年间认知障碍专科诊所转诊的美国老年人的职业治疗驾驶评估(n = 151)。通过对患者进行预测试面试和知识丰富的护理人员来评估驾驶能力,然后进行客观的BTW测试。被转诊的患者平均年龄为77.6(SD = 8.1)岁,男性为97%,白人为98%。结果表明,大多数患者对驾驶问题的评估为时已晚,只有3%的样本被评估为不受限制地独立驾驶,建议38%的人退出驾驶。尽管患者和护理人员均否认相对于客观测试的特定驾驶问题(服从标志和灯光),但护理人员的关注程度大于其各自患者的关注程度(p <0.001),并且与路测结果相关(p = 0.001)。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号