首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Global Spine Journal >Anterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion as a Salvage Technique for Pseudarthrosis following Posterior Lumbar Fusion Surgery
【2h】

Anterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion as a Salvage Technique for Pseudarthrosis following Posterior Lumbar Fusion Surgery

机译:腰椎前路椎间融合术作为后路腰椎融合手术后假关节的抢救技术

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

>Study Design Retrospective analysis of prospectively collected observational data. >Objective To assess the safety and efficacy of anterior lumbar interbody fusion (ALIF) as a salvage option for lumbar pseudarthrosis following failed posterior lumbar fusion surgery. >Methods From 2009 to 2013, patient outcome data was collected prospectively over 5 years from 327 patients undergoing ALIF performed by a single surgeon (R.J.M.) with 478 levels performed. Among these, there were 20 cases of failed prior posterior fusion that subsequently underwent ALIF. Visual analog score (VAS), Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), and Short Form 12-item health survey (SF-12) were measured pre- and postoperatively. The verification of fusion was determined by utilizing a fine-cut computed tomography scan at 12-month follow-up. >Results There was a significant difference between the preoperative (7.25 ± 0.8) and postoperative (3.1 ± 2.1) VAS scores (p < 0.0001). The ODI scale also demonstrated a statistically significant reduction from preoperative (56.3 ± 16.5) and postoperative (30.4 ± 19.3) scores (p < 0.0001). The SF-12 scores were significantly improved after ALIF salvage surgery: Physical Health Composite Score (32.18 ± 5.5 versus 41.07 ± 9.67, p = 0.0003) and Mental Health Composite Score (36.62 ± 12.25 versus 50.89 ± 10.86, p = 0.0001). Overall, 19 patients (95%) achieved successful fusion. >Conclusions Overall, our results suggest that the ALIF procedure results not only in radiographic improvements in bony fusion but in significant improvements in the patient's physical and mental experience of pain secondary to lumbar pseudarthrosis. Future multicenter registry studies and randomized controlled trials should be conducted to confirm the long-term benefit of ALIF as a salvage option for failed posterior lumbar fusion.
机译:>研究设计对前瞻性收集的观测数据进行回顾性分析。 >目的为了评估后路腰椎融合手术失败后腰椎前路椎间融合术(ALIF)作为腰椎假关节抢救的安全性和有效性。 >方法从2009年至2013年,前瞻性收集了由单一外科医师(R.J.M.)对327名接受ALIF治疗的患者进行了5年的随访,共478例患者的结果。在这些病例中,有20例先前的后路融合失败,随后接受了ALIF。术前和术后测量视觉模拟评分(VAS),Oswestry残疾指数(ODI)和简短形式12项健康状况调查(SF-12)。融合的验证是通过在12个月的随访中使用精细切割的计算机断层扫描来确定的。 >结果术前VAS评分(7.25±0.8)和术后VAS评分(3.1±2.1)之间存在显着差异(p <0.0001)。 ODI量表也显示出术前评分(56.3±16.5)和术后评分(30.4±19.3)(p <0.0001),具有统计学意义。进行ALIF抢救手术后SF-12得分显着提高:身体健康综合评分(32.18±5.5对41.07±9.67,p = 0.0003)和精神健康综合评分(36.62±12.25对50.89±10.86,p = 0.0001)。总体而言,有19例患者(95%)成功融合。 >结论:总体而言,我们的结果表明,ALIF手术不仅可以改善骨融合的放射学影像,而且可以显着改善患者因腰椎假关节疼痛而产生的身体和心理体验。应该进行未来的多中心注册研究和随机对照试验,以确认ALIF作为后路腰椎融合失败的救治选择的长期益处。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号