首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Global Spine Journal >Lumbar Disk Herniation Surgery: Outcome and Predictors
【2h】

Lumbar Disk Herniation Surgery: Outcome and Predictors

机译:腰椎间盘突出症手术:结果和预测因素

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

>Study Design A retrospective cohort study. >Objectives To determine the outcome and any differences in the clinical results of three different surgical methods for lumbar disk herniation and to assess the effect of factors that could predict the outcome of surgery. >Methods We evaluated 148 patients who had operations for lumbar disk herniation from March 2006 to March 2011 using three different surgical techniques (laminectomy, microscopically assisted percutaneous nucleotomy, and spinous process osteotomy) by using Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA) Back Pain Evaluation Questionnaire, Resumption of Activities of Daily Living scale and changes of visual analog scale (VAS) for low back pain and radicular pain. Our study questionnaire addressed patient subjective satisfaction with the operation, residual complaints, and job resumption. Data were analyzed with SPSS version 16.0 (SPSS, Inc., Chicago, Illinois, United States). Statistical significance was set at 0.05. For statistical analysis, chi-square test, Mann-Whitney U test, Kruskal-Wallis test, and repeated measure analysis were performed. For determining the confounding factors, univariate analysis by chi-square test was used and followed by logistic regression analysis. >Results Ninety-four percent of our patients were satisfied with the results of their surgeries. VAS documented an overall 93.3% success rate for reduction of radicular pain. Laminectomy resulted in better outcome in terms of JOA Back Pain Evaluation Questionnaire. The outcome of surgery did not significantly differ by age, sex, level of education, preoperative VAS for back, preoperative VAS for radicular pain, return to previous job, or level of herniation. >Conclusion Surgery for lumbar disk herniation is effective in reducing radicular pain (93.4%). All three surgical approaches resulted in significant decrease in preoperative radicular pain and low back pain, but intergroup variation in the outcome was not achieved. As indicated by JOA Back Pain Evaluation Questionnaire–Low Back Pain (JOABPQ-LBP) and lumbar function functional scores, laminectomy achieved significantly better outcome compared with other methods. It is worth mentioning that relief of radicular pain was associated with subjective satisfaction with the surgery among our study population. Predictive factors for ineffective surgical treatment for lumbar disk herniation were female sex and negative preoperative straight leg raising. Age, level of education, and preoperative VAS for low back pain were other factors that showed prediction power.
机译:>研究设计:一项回顾性队列研究。 >目标确定三种不同的腰椎间盘突出症手术方法的结果以及临床结果的差异,并评估可预测手术结果的因素的效果。 >方法我们通过2006年3月至2011年3月使用日本矫形外科协会(JOA)的三种不同的外科手术技术(椎板切除术,显微镜辅助的经皮核仁切开术和棘突截骨术)对148例腰椎间盘突出症手术患者进行了评估)腰痛评估问卷,恢复日常生活活动量表以及视觉模拟量表(VAS)的改变,用于腰痛和神经根痛。我们的研究问卷针对患者对手术的主观满意度,残留投诉和恢复工作。使用SPSS 16.0版(美国伊利诺伊州芝加哥的SPSS公司)分析数据。统计显着性设定为0.05。为了进行统计分析,进行了卡方检验,Mann-Whitney U检验,Kruskal-Wallis检验和重复测量分析。为了确定混杂因素,使用卡方检验进行单变量分析,然后进行逻辑回归分析。 >结果我们有94%的患者对手术结果感到满意。 VAS记录显示,根治性疼痛减轻的总体成功率为93.3%。根据JOA腰痛评估问卷,椎板切除术可带来更好的预后。手术结局在年龄,性别,受教育程度,背部术前VAS,神经痛,术前VAS,重返以前的工作或疝水平等方面均无显着差异。 >结论腰椎间盘突出症的手术可有效减轻神经根痛(93.4%)。所有这三种手术方法均使术前放射神经痛和下背痛明显减轻,但结局并未达到组间差异。正如JOA腰痛评估问卷-低腰痛(JOABPQ-LBP)和腰部功能评分所表明的那样,椎板切除术比其他方法具有明显更好的疗效。值得一提的是,在我们的研究人群中,放射痛的缓解与手术的主观满意度有关。腰椎间盘突出症手术治疗无效的预测因素是女性和术前直腿抬高为阴性。年龄,学历和下腰痛的术前VAS是其他具有预测力的因素。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号