首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Hand (New York N.Y.) >Scaphoid Excision and Limited Wrist Fusion: A Comparison of K-Wire and Circular Plate Fixation
【2h】

Scaphoid Excision and Limited Wrist Fusion: A Comparison of K-Wire and Circular Plate Fixation

机译:舟骨切除术和手腕融合受限:K线和圆板固定的比较

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

The purpose of this study was to compare the clinical outcome, union rate, and complications of a consecutive series of Scaphoid excision and limited wrist arthrodesis performed by a single surgeon using distal radius bone graft and K-wires or circular plate fixation. A sequential series of ten patients(11 wrists) who were stabilized with temporary K-wires were compared to 11 patients (11 wrists) who were stabilized with a circular plate. Minimum follow-up was 1 year. One patient in the K-wire group was converted to a wrist fusion. Six of the remaining ten patients in the K-wire fixation group and 8 of the 11 patients in the circular plate fixation group returned for the following blinded evaluations: Quick DASH, analog pain scale, range of motion, grip and pinch strength, plain x-ray, and multi-detector computed tomography evaluation. One non-union occurred in the K-wire group. There were no non-unions in the circular plate fixation group. There was no difference in any of remaining measures or rate of complications. This study shows that equivalent results can be obtained using circular plate fixation compared to K-wires when equivalent bone graft source and fusion technique are used. If K-wire removal requires a return to the OR, circular plate fixation is more cost-effective.
机译:这项研究的目的是比较由单名外科医生用distal骨远端植骨和K线或圆盘固定术进行的一系列连续的舟状切除术和有限的腕关节固定术的临床结局,合并率和并发症。将连续使用临时K线稳定的10例患者(11个腕部)与连续使用圆形钢板稳定的11例患者(11个腕部)进行比较。最低随访时间为1年。 K-wire组中的一名患者被转化为手腕融合术。 K-wire固定组中其余十名患者中的六名患者和圆板固定组中11名患者中的八名患者返回进行以下盲目评估:快速DASH,模拟疼痛量表,运动范围,握力和捏力,普通x射线和多探测器计算机断层扫描评估。 K-wire组发生了一次不愈合。圆板固定组中无骨不连。其余指标或并发症发生率均无差异。这项研究表明,当使用等效的骨移植物源和融合技术时,与K线相比,使用圆形钢板固定可以获得等效的结果。如果移除K线需要返回OR,则圆形板固定更具成本效益。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号