首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Health Services Research >Barriers between guidelines and improved patient care: an analysis of AHCPRs Unstable Angina Clinical Practice Guideline. Agency for Health Care Policy and Research.
【2h】

Barriers between guidelines and improved patient care: an analysis of AHCPRs Unstable Angina Clinical Practice Guideline. Agency for Health Care Policy and Research.

机译:指南与改善患者护理之间的障碍:AHCPR不稳定型心绞痛临床实践指南的分析。卫生保健政策与研究机构。

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

OBJECTIVES: To describe common barriers that limit the effect of guidelines on patient care, with emphasis on recommendations for triage in the Agency for Health Care Policy and Research (AHCPR) Unstable Angina Clinical Practice Guideline. DATA SOURCES: Previously reported results from a prospective clinical study of 10,785 patients presenting to the emergency department (ED) with symptoms suggestive of acute cardiac ischemia. STUDY DESIGN: Design is an analysis of the AHCPR guideline with regard to recognized barriers in guideline implementation. Presentation of hypothetical scenarios to ED physicians was used to determine interrater reliability in applying the guideline to assess risk and to make triage decisions. PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: The AHCPR guideline's triage recommendations demonstrate (1) poor interobserver reliability in interpretation by ED physicians; (2) limited applicability of recommendations for outpatient management (applies to 6 percent of patients presenting to the ED with unstable angina); (3) incomplete specifications of exceptions that may require deviation from guideline recommendations; (4) unexpected effects on medical care by significantly increasing the demand for limited intensive care beds; and (5) unknown effects on patient outcomes. In addition, analysis of the guideline highlights the need to address organizational barriers, such as administrative policies that conflict with guideline recommendations and the need to adapt the guideline to conform to local systems of care. CONCLUSIONS: Careful analysis of guideline attributes, projected effect on medical care, and organizational factors reveal several barriers to successful guideline implementation that should be addressed in the design of future guideline-based interventions.
机译:目的:描述限制指南对患者护理效果的常见障碍,重点是《卫生保健政策与研究机构(AHCPR)不稳定型心绞痛临床实践指南》中的分诊建议。数据来源:先前报道的一项前瞻性临床研究结果来自对急诊科(ED)的10,785名患者的症状提示急性心肌缺血的研究。研究设计:设计是对AHCPR准则的分析,涉及准则实施中的公认障碍。向急诊医师介绍假想情景,以在应用指南评估风险和做出分流决策时确定间质信度。主要发现:AHCPR指南的分类建议表明:(1)ED医生在观察者间的可靠性差; (2)门诊治疗建议的适用性有限(适用于就诊为急诊室不稳定型心绞痛的患者的6%); (3)可能要求偏离准则建议的例外规范不完整; (4)通过显着增加对有限的重症监护病床的需求而对医疗产生意想不到的影响; (5)对患者预后的未知影响。此外,对指南的分析还强调了应对组织障碍的必要性,例如与指南建议相冲突的行政政策,以及需要对指南进行调整以符合当地护理体系的需要。结论:对指南属性的仔细分析,对医疗的预期影响以及组织因素,揭示了成功实施指南的一些障碍,这些障碍应在未来基于指南的干预措施设计中解决。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号