首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Health Services Research >Rural and urban differences in physician resource use for low-risk obstetrics.
【2h】

Rural and urban differences in physician resource use for low-risk obstetrics.

机译:低风险产科医师资源利用的城乡差异。

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

OBJECTIVE: To explore the hypothesis that rural obstetricians (OBs) and family physicians (FPs) utilized fewer resources during the care of the low-risk women who initially booked with them than did their urban counterparts of the same specialties. DATA SOURCES/STUDY DESIGN: A stratified random sample of Washington state rural and urban OBs and FPs was selected during 1989. A participation rate of 89 percent yielded 209 participating physicians. The prenatal and intrapartum medical records of a random sample of the low-risk patients who initiated care with the sampled providers during a one-year period were abstracted in detail and analyzed with the physician as the unit of analysis. Complete data for 1,683 patients were collected. Resource use elements (e.g., urine culture) were combined by standardizing them with average charge data so that aggregate resource use could be analyzed. Intraspecialty comparisons for resource use by category and overall were performed. FINDINGS/CONCLUSIONS: Results show that rural physicians use fewer overall resources in caring for nonreferred low-risk-booking obstetric patients than do their urban colleagues. Resource use unit expenditures showed the hypothesized pattern for both specialties for total, intrapartum, and prenatal care with the exception of FPs for prenatal care. Approximately 80 percent of the resource units used by each physician type were related to hospital care. No differences were shown in patterns of care for most clinically important aspects of care (e.g., cesarean delivery rates), and no evidence suggested that outcomes differed. The overall differences were due to specific components of care (e.g., fewer intrapartum hospital days and less epidural anesthesia).
机译:目的:探讨以下假设:在最初向她们预订的低风险妇女的护理过程中,农村妇产科医生和家庭医生所使用的资源比同等城市的同行要少。数据源/研究设计:在1989年期间,我们抽取了华盛顿州农村和城市OB和FP的分层随机样本。参与率为89%,产生了209名参与医师。随机抽取了低风险患者的随机样本的产前和产前医疗记录,这些样本是在一年的时间里开始与样本提供者进行护理的,并以医师为分析单位进行分析。收集了1,683名患者的完整数据。通过将资源使用要素(例如尿液培养)与平均费用数据标准化来进行组合,以便可以分析总体资源使用情况。进行了按类别和总体对资源使用情况的内部比较。研究结果/结论:与城市同事相比,农村医生在照料低风险预订产科患者时使用的整体资源更少。资源使用单位支出显示了全部,分娩和产前保健两个专业的假设模式,但产前保健的FP除外。每种医师使用的资源单元中约有80%与医院护理有关。对于临床上最重要的护理方面(例如剖宫产率)的护理方式没有显示出差异,也没有证据表明结果有所不同。总体差异是由于护理的特定组成部分(例如,产时住院天数减少和硬膜外麻醉次数减少)所致。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号