首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Healthcare Policy >A Cautionary Tale of Downloading Public Health in Ontario: What Does It Say about the Need for National Standards for More Than Doctors and Hospitals?
【2h】

A Cautionary Tale of Downloading Public Health in Ontario: What Does It Say about the Need for National Standards for More Than Doctors and Hospitals?

机译:在安大略省下载公共卫生的警示故事:对于超过医生和医院的国家标准的需求它怎么说?

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

The 2003 SARS outbreak highlighted the importance of maintaining an adequate public health (PH) infrastructure, and cast doubt on the wisdom of basing the system locally without adequate provisions for higher-level oversight and coordination. Structurally, it highlighted the policy legacy of the 1998 Ontario decision to download full responsibility for funding PH services to municipal governments, forcing such services into budgetary competition with the “hard” services traditionally provided by local government. The federal role in PH has traditionally been minimal; PH was never included as a mandatory service in the Canada Health Act, while reform proposals have focused upon such admittedly important directions as pharmacare and home care rather than PH. Although PH has moved up the policy agenda, with a focus on pandemic preparedness, the Ontario events suggest a pressing need for setting national and provincial/territorial standards for PH, and developing mechanisms for enforcing them.
机译:2003年的SARS疫情凸显了维持适当的公共卫生(PH)基础设施的重要性,并使人们对在没有适当的高层监督和协调规定的情况下在本地建立该系统的智慧表示怀疑。从结构上讲,它突出了1998年安大略省决定的政策遗产,该决定将全部责任下载到为市政府提供PH服务,这迫使这些服务与地方政府传统上提供的“硬”服务进入预算竞争。传统上,PH在联邦政府中的角色很少。 PH从未被列为《加拿大卫生法》的强制性服务,而改革提案则侧重于公认的重要方向,例如药学和家庭护理,而不是PH。尽管PH已将政策重点放在大流行的防备上,但安大略事件表明迫切需要为PH建立国家和省/地区标准,并制定执行标准。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号