首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Health Expectations : An International Journal of Public Participation in Health Care and Health Policy >Using vignettes to explore judgements of patients about safety and quality of care: the role of outcome and relationship with the care provider
【2h】

Using vignettes to explore judgements of patients about safety and quality of care: the role of outcome and relationship with the care provider

机译:使用短片探索患者对治疗安全性和质量的判断:结果的作用以及与治疗提供者的关系

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

>Background  There is a growing body of evidence that safe outcomes and quality care are important to patients. For the patient, evaluations of safety and quality are made on the basis of the interpersonal interactions that they have with health professionals as well as the technical aspects of their care. >Objective  In this study, we investigated the extent to which outcome of care (harm or not) and relationship (good or bad) with the care provider impact on the judgements of responsibility and blame as well as decisions about likelihood of making a complaint. >Method  Ninety‐eight mothers made seven ratings of responsibility, blame and action in response to four hypothetical vignettes in a questionnaire. The vignettes described poor quality ante‐natal care in which outcome and relationship with the health‐care provider were systematically manipulated across different versions of the questionnaire. >Results  Multivariate analyses showed that participants made significantly more negative ratings in response to vignettes describing a bad outcome and those that described a poor relationship with the health professional. However, whilst ratings of seriousness and likelihood of making a complaint were most influenced by the manipulation of outcome in the vignettes, judgements of blame and responsibility were most effected by the depiction of relationship with the health professional as good or bad. Moreover, for three of the four vignettes, relationship rather than outcome most strongly influenced overall ratings of care. >Discussion  These findings are discussed in the context of theory and policy developments.
机译:>背景越来越多的证据表明,安全的结果和优质的护理对患者很重要。对于患者,安全性和质量的评估是基于他们与卫生专业人员之间的人际互动以及他们的护理技术方面。 >目的:在这项研究中,我们调查了护理结果(是否有害)以及与护理人员之间的关系(好坏)对责任与责备判断以及有关决策的影响程度提出投诉的可能性。 >方法在问卷中,有48位母亲对4个假设的暗角做出了7个责任,责备和行动的评分。短片描述了质量差的产前保健,其中在不同版本的问卷中系统地操纵了结果和与保健提供者的关系。 >结果多元分析显示,参与者对描述不良结局的小插曲和与卫生专业人员的关系不好的小插曲做出了更大的负面评价。然而,虽然对严重程度的评价和提出投诉的可能性受小插曲中对结果的操纵的影响最大,但对责任感和责任感的判断却受与卫生专业人员的好坏关系的描述影响最大。此外,对于四个渐晕患者中的三个,关系而不是结果最显着地影响了总体护理等级。 >讨论:这些发现是在理论和政策发展的背景下进行讨论的。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号