首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Heredity >Comparing direct and indirect selfing rate estimates: when are population-structure estimates reliable?
【2h】

Comparing direct and indirect selfing rate estimates: when are population-structure estimates reliable?

机译:直接和间接自交率估计值比较:人口结构估计值何时可靠?

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

The rate of self-fertilization (that is, selfing) is a key evolutionary parameter in hermaphroditic species, yet obtaining accurate estimates of selfing rates in natural populations can be technically challenging. Most published estimates are derived from population-level heterozygote deficiency (that is, FIS) or identity disequilibria (for example, the software RMES (robust multilocus estimate of selfing)). These indirect methods can be applied to population genetic survey data, whereas direct methods using progeny arrays require much larger data sets that are often difficult to collect in natural populations or even require captive breeding. Unfortunately, indirect methods rely on assumptions that can be problematic, such as negating biparental inbreeding, inbreeding disequilibrium and (for FIS) the presence of null alleles. The performance of indirect estimates against progeny-array estimates is still largely unknown. Here we used both direct progeny-array and indirect population-level methods to estimate the selfing rate in a single natural population of the simultaneously hermaphroditic freshwater snail Radix balthica throughout its reproductive lifespan using 10 highly polymorphic microsatellites. We found that even though progeny arrays (n=1034 field-collected embryos from 60 families) did not reveal a single selfed embryo, FIS-based selfing rates (n=316 adults) were significantly positive in all 6 sequential population samples. Including a locus with a high frequency of null alleles further biased FIS-based estimates. Conversely, RMES-based estimates were very similar to progeny-array estimates and proved insensitive to null alleles. The assumptions made by RMES were thus either met or irrelevant in this particular population, making RMES a valid, cost-efficient alternative to progeny arrays.
机译:自体受精率(即自交)是雌雄同体物种的关键进化参数,但是获得自然种群中自交率的准确估计可能在技术上具有挑战性。大多数公开的估算值均来自人群水平的杂合子缺陷(即FIS)或身份不平衡(例如,软件RMES(自洽的鲁棒多位点估算))。这些间接方法可以应用于种群遗传调查数据,而使用后代阵列的直接方法则需要更大的数据集,而这些数据集通常很难在自然种群中收集甚至需要圈养。不幸的是,间接方法依赖于可能有问题的假设,例如否定双亲近亲繁殖,近亲近亲不平衡和(对于FIS)无效等位基因的存在。间接估计相对于子代数组估计的性能仍然未知。在这里,我们使用直接后代阵列和间接种群水平方法,使用10个高度多态的微卫星,估计了同时雌雄同体的淡水蜗牛Rad的整个繁殖寿命中单个自然种群的自交率。我们发现,即使后代阵列(来自60个家庭的n = 1034个现场采集的胚胎)没有揭示单个自交胚胎,基于FIS的自交率(n = 316个成年)在所有6个连续人群样本中也显着阳性。包括具有高频率无效等位基因的基因座,进一步使基于FIS的估计偏倚。相反,基于RMES的估计与后代阵列估计非常相似,并且被证明对无效等位基因不敏感。因此,在该特定人群中,RMES所做的假设已达到或不相关,从而使RMES成为后代阵列的有效且具有成本效益的替代方案。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号