首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Medicina Oral Patologa Oral y Ciruga Bucal >The relevance of uniform reporting in oral leukoplakia: Definition certainty factor and staging based on experience with 275 patients
【2h】

The relevance of uniform reporting in oral leukoplakia: Definition certainty factor and staging based on experience with 275 patients

机译:统一报告在口腔白斑中的相关性:定义确定性因素和分期基于275位患者的经验

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

The aim of the present study was to evaluate the definition of oral leukoplakia, proposed by the WHO in 2005 and taking into account a previously reported classification and staging system, including the use of a Certainty factor of four levels with which the diagnosis of leukoplakia can be established. In the period 1997-2012 a hospital-based population of 275 consecutive patients with a provisional diagnosis of oral leukoplakia has been examined. In only 176 patients of these 275 patients a firm diagnosis of leukoplakia has been established based on strict clinicopathological criteria. The 176 patients have subsequently been staged using a classification and staging system based on size and histopathologic features. For use in epidemiological studies it seems acceptable to accept a diagnosis of leukoplakia based on a single oral examination (Certainty level 1). For studies on management and malignant transformation rate the recommendation is made to include the requirement of histopathologic examination of an incisional or excisional biopsy, representing Certainty level 3 and 4, respectively. This recommendation results in the following definition of oral leukoplakia: “A predominantly white lesion or plaque of questionable behaviour having excluded, clinically and histopathologically, any other definable white disease or disorder”. Furthermore, we recommend the use of strict diagnostic criteria for predominantly white lesions for which a causative factor has been identified, e.g. smokers’ lesion, frictional lesion and dental restoration associated lesion. > Key words:Oral epithelial dysplasia, oral leukoplakia, potentially malignant oral disorders.
机译:本研究的目的是评估WHO在2005年提出的口腔白斑的定义,并考虑到先前报道的分类和分期系统,包括使用四个级别的确定性因子来诊断白斑。被建立。在1997年至2012年期间,对275名连续诊断为口腔白斑的患者进行了医院检查。在这275名患者中,只有176名患者根据严格的临床病理学标准对白斑进行了确诊。随后根据大小和组织病理学特征使用分类和分期系统对176例患者进行了分期。为了用于流行病学研究,接受基于单次口腔检查的白斑诊断是可以接受的(确定性等级1)。对于管理和恶性转化率的研究,建议包括对切开或切除活检进行组织病理学检查的要求,分别代表确定性水平3和4。该建议得出以下口腔白斑的定义:“主要为白色的病变或行为可疑的斑块,在临床和组织病理学上已排除了任何其他可定义的白色疾病或障碍”。此外,我们建议对已发现病因的主要白色病变使用严格的诊断标准,例如吸烟者的病变,摩擦性病变和与牙齿修复相关的病变。 >关键词:口腔上皮发育不良,口腔白斑,潜在的恶性口腔疾病。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号