首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Infection and Drug Resistance >Simulating moxalactam dosage for extended-spectrum β-lactamase-producing Enterobacteriaceae using blood antimicrobial surveillance network data
【2h】

Simulating moxalactam dosage for extended-spectrum β-lactamase-producing Enterobacteriaceae using blood antimicrobial surveillance network data

机译:使用血液抗菌监测网络数据模拟用于产生广谱β-内酰胺酶肠杆菌科细菌的莫西内酰胺剂量

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

>Objectives: Monte Carlo simulation (MCS) was used to evaluate optimal dosage for cefepime (FEP), moxalactam (MOX), and cefperazone/sulbactam (CFZ/SBT) against extended-spectrum β-lactamase (ESBL) producers isolated from the Blood Bacterial Resistant Investigation Collaborative System.>Methods: Minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) was tested by agar dilution, and ESBL producers were identified by modified Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute tests. Pharmacokinetic parameters were derived from data on healthy individuals, and probability of target attainment (PTA) and cumulative fraction of response (CFR) %fT >MIC values were estimated by MCS.>Results: A total of 2032 Escherichia coli (875 ESBL-producing) and Klebsiella pneumoniae (157 ESBL-producing) strains, and 371 other Enterobacteriaceae strains, were isolated from patients with bloodstream infections (BSIs). MIC90 values for FEP, MOX, and CFZ/SBT against ESBL-producing E. coli and K. pneumoniae were 64/64 mg/L, 2/32 mg/L, and 64/128 mg/L, respectively. Conventional MOX and CFZ/SBT doses failed to reach 90% PTA against isolates with MICs ≥8 mg/L and ≥4 mg/L, respectively. Against ESBL producers, neither FEP nor CFZ/SBT achieved ≥90% CFR, while CFRs for MOX (1 g iv q6h, 2 g iv q12h, and 2 g iv q8h) exceeded 90% against ESBL-producing E. coli. Simulated CFRs for FEP and MOX were similar (>90%) against non-ESBL-producing Enterobacteriaceae, and higher than CFRs for CFZ/SBT.>Conclusion: ESBL producers from BSIs were highly susceptible to MOX, and PTA values were generally higher for MOX than FEP or CFZ/SBT for conventional dosing regimens. This large MCS analysis shows that MOX but not FEP or CFZ/SBT can be used empirically to treat BSIs caused by ESBL-producing E. coli strains.
机译:>目标:使用蒙特卡罗模拟(MCS)评估头孢吡肟(FEP),莫拉内酰胺(MOX)和头孢哌酮/舒巴坦(CFZ / SBT)对抗广谱β-内酰胺酶(ESBL)的最佳剂量)从血液细菌耐药性研究合作系统中分离出来的生产者。>方法:通过琼脂稀释测试最低抑菌浓度(MIC),并通过改良的临床和实验室标准协会测试确定ESBL生产者。药代动力学参数来自健康个体的数据,并通过MCS估算了目标达成率(PTA)和累积应答分数(CFR)%fT> MIC值。>结果:总共2032株大肠杆菌从患有血流感染(BSI)的患者中分离出大肠埃希菌(875个ESBL产生菌)和肺炎克雷伯菌(157个ESBL产生菌)菌株和371个其他肠杆菌科菌株。 FEP,MOX和CFZ / SBT对产ESBL的大肠杆菌和肺炎克雷伯菌的MIC90值分别为64/64 mg / L,2/32 mg / L和64/128 mg / L。对于MIC≥8 mg / L和≥4mg / L的分离株,常规MOX和CFZ / SBT剂量无法达到90%PTA。对于ESBL生产商,FEP和CFZ / SBT均未达到90%CFR,而MOX(1 g iv q6h,2 g iv q12h和2 g iv q8h)的CFR对生产ESBL的大肠杆菌而言均未超过90%。 FEP和MOX的模拟病死率与非ESBL产肠杆菌相似(> 90%),高于CFZ / SBT的CFR。>结论: BSI的ESBL生产者极易感染MOX,并且对于常规给药方案,MOX的PTA值通常高于FEP或CFZ / SBT。大量的MCS分析表明,可以凭经验使用MOX而非FEP或CFZ / SBT来治疗由产生ESBL的大肠杆菌菌株引起的BSI。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号