首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Mediterranean Journal of Hematology and Infectious Diseases >Comparison of Three Distinct Prophylactic Agents Against Invasive Fungal Infections in Patients Undergoing Haplo-identical Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation and Post-transplant Cyclophosphamide
【2h】

Comparison of Three Distinct Prophylactic Agents Against Invasive Fungal Infections in Patients Undergoing Haplo-identical Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation and Post-transplant Cyclophosphamide

机译:三种相同的造血干细胞移植和移植后环磷酰胺移植患者侵袭性真菌感染预防剂的比较

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Over the past decade, invasive fungal infections (IFIs) have remained an important problem in patients undergoing allogeneic haematopoietic stem cell transplantation (Allo-HSCT). The optimal approach for prophylactic antifungal therapy has yet to bedetermined.We conducted a retrospective analysis, comparing the safety and efficacy of micafungin 50mg/day vs. fluconazole 400mg/day vs. itraconazole 200mg/day as prophylaxis for adult patients with various haematological diseases receiving haploidentical hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (haplo-HSCT) followed by high-dose cyclophosphamide (PT-Cy).Overall, 99 patients were identified: 30 patients received micafungin, 50 and 19 patients received itraconazole and fluconazole, respectively. After a median follow-up of 12 months (range: 1–51), proven or probable IFIs were reported in 3 patients (10%) in the micafungin, 5 patients in the itraconazole (10%) and 2 patients (11%) in the fluconazole group (p=0.998). Fewer patients in the micafungin group had invasive aspergillosis (1 [3%] vs. 3 [6%] in the itraconazole vs. 2 [11%] in the fluconazole group, p=0.589). Four patients (13%) in the micafungin group vs 13 (26%) patients in the itraconazole group and 10 (53%) patients in the fluconazole received empirical antifungal therapy (P = 0.19).No serious adverse events related to treatment were reported by patients, and there was no treatment discontinuation because of drug-related adverse events in both groups.The present analysis shows that micafungin did better than fluconazole in preventing invasive aspergillosis after transplant in these high-risk hematological diseases, as expected. In addition, micafungin was more effective than itraconazole in preventing all IFI episodes when also considering possible fungal infections. Future prospective studies would shed light on this issue, concerning this increasingly used transplant platform.
机译:在过去的十年中,侵袭性真菌感染(IFI)仍然是接受同种异体造血干细胞移植(Allo-HSCT)的患者的重要问题。预防性抗真菌治疗的最佳方法尚未确定,我们进行了回顾性分析,比较了米卡芬净50mg /天,氟康唑400mg /天与伊曲康唑200mg /天作为预防各种血液病的成年患者的安全性和有效性进行了单倍体造血干细胞移植(haplo-HSCT),然后进行了大剂量环磷酰胺(PT-Cy)的研究。总共鉴定出99例患者:米卡芬净30例,伊曲康唑和氟康唑分别为50例和19例。中位随访12个月(范围:1-51)后,米卡芬净中3例(10%),伊曲康唑5例(10%)和2例(11%)的IFI被证实或可能报告。在氟康唑组中(p = 0.998)。米卡芬净组的侵袭性曲霉病患者较少(伊曲康唑为1 [3%],伊曲康唑为3 [6%],而氟康唑组为2 [11%],p = 0.589)。米卡芬净组中有4例患者(13%),伊曲康唑组中13例(26%)和氟康唑中10例(53%)患者接受了经验性抗真菌治疗(P = 0.19),未见与治疗相关的严重不良事件的报道。两组患者均未因药物相关的不良事件而停止治疗。本分析表明,在预期的这些高风险血液病患者中,米卡芬净在预防移植后侵袭性曲霉病方面优于氟康唑。此外,在考虑可能的真菌感染时,米卡芬净在预防所有IFI发作方面比伊曲康唑更有效。关于这个日益使用的移植平台,未来的前瞻性研究将为这个问题提供启示。

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号